Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities (T-243/05)
Judgment
Substance of the action
Arable crops
The first plea: the Commission's lack…
—Findings of the Court
36

Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities (T-243/05)

law://eu/cjeu/2005/t-243-05/para_36@2026-11-14

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber
Case: T-243/05 · ECLI:EU:T:2007:270
Decided: 12 Sept 2007
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Hellenic Republic
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Papasavvas
Bench: 3 judges
J. Pirrung, N.J. Forwood, S. Papasawas
Language: Greek
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62005TJ0243

Topics

Agricultural funds

History · 1 version

12 Sept 2007Reading

Judgment of 12 Sept 2007

36It is clear from well-established case-law that Article 5(2)(c) of Regulation No 729/70 and the fifth subparagraph of Article 7(4) of Regulation No 1258/1999, on the one hand, and the first subparagraph of Article 8(1) of Regulation No 1663/95, on the other, refer to the same stage of the EAGGF accounts clearance procedure, that is to say, the sending of the first communication by the Commission to the Member State following the checks which it has carried out. Accordingly, the first subparagraph of Article 8(1) of Regulation No 1663/95 specifies the content of the written communication required under Article 5(2)(c) of Regulation No 729/70 and the fifth subparagraph of Article 7(4) of Regulation No 1258/1999 (Case C-170/00 Finland v Commission [2002] ECR I-1007, paragraphs 26 and 27; Case C-158/00 Luxembourg v Commission [2002] ECR I-5373, paragraph 23; and Case C-300/02 Greece v Commission [2005] ECR I-1341, paragraph 68).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 20: Portuguese Republic v European Commission (T-38/19); Portuguese Republic v European Commission (T-474/17); Italian Republic v European Commission (T-135/15); Portuguese Republic v European Commission (T-233/17); Italian Republic v European Commission (T-686/14); Republic of Poland v European Commission (T-257/13); Italian Republic v European Commission (T-387/12); Republic of Bulgaria v European Commission (T-335/11); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-294/11); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-46/09)2 provisions; Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-588/10); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-215/10); Italian Republic v European Commission (T-84/09); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-356/08); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-86/08)5 provisions; Italian Republic v European Commission (T-267/06); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-352/05); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-214/07); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-184/09); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-113/08)
Cites 19: République de Finlande v Commission of the European Communities (C-170/00); Council Regulation (EC) No 1258/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the financing of the common agricultural policy; Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-332/01); Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-247/98); Council Regulation (EEC) No 3508/92 of 27 November 1992 establishing an integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes; Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-300/02); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-130/99); Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-61/95); Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3887/92 of 23 December 1992 laying down detailed rules for applying the integrated administration and control system for certain Community aid schemes; Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-329/00); Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 of the Council of 21 April 1970 on the financing of the common agricultural policy; Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-253/97); Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities (C-278/98); Commission Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 of 7 July 1995 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 regarding the procedure for the clearance of the accounts of the EAGGF Guarantee Section; Commission Regulation (EC) No 2245/1999 of 22 October 1999 amending Regulation (EC) No 1663/95 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 regarding the procedure for the clearance of the accounts of the EAGGF Guarantee Section; Grand Duchy of Luxemburg v Commission of the European Communities (C-158/00); Commission Regulation (EC) No 296/96 of 16 February 1996 on data to be forwarded by the Member States and the monthly booking of expenditure financed under the Guarantee Section of the Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2776/88; Council Regulation (EC) No 1251/1999 of 17 May 1999 establishing a support system for producers of certain arable crops; Hellenic Republic v Commission of the European Communities (T-251/04)