Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Unibet (London) Ltd and Unibet (International) Ltd v Justitiekanslern (C-432/05)
Judgment
The questions referred for a prelimina…
Preliminary considerations
33

Unibet (London) Ltd and Unibet (International) Ltd v Justitiekanslern (C-432/05)

Judgment of 13 Mar 2007law://eu/cjeu/2005/c-432-05/para_33@2026-11-12

33The question whether Unibet's action is admissible before the Swedish courts, which is the subject of the first question referred by the Högsta domstolen, is irrelevant for the purposes of determining whether the reference for a preliminary ruling is admissible.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-432/05 · ECLI:EU:C:2007:163
Decided: 13 Mar 2007
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Högsta domstolen (Sweden)
Applicants: Unibet (London) Ltd; Unibet (International) Ltd
Defendant: Justitiekanslern
Rapporteur: K. Lenaerts
Advocate General: E. Sharpston
Bench: 13 judges
V. Skouris, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas, K. Lenaerts, R. Schintgen, P. Kūris, E. Juhász, J. Makarczyk, G. Arestis, U. Lõhmus, E. Levits, A. Ó Caoimh, L. Bay Larsen
Language: Swedish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62005CJ0432

Topics

Freedom to provide services Principles of Union law

History · 1 version

13 Mar 2007Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 23: Andy Wightman and Others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (C-621/18)2 provisions; État luxembourgeois v B and Others (C-245/19, C-246/19); Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses v Tribunal de Contas (C-64/16); Criminal proceedings against K.P (C-530/23); XC and Others v Generalprokuratur (C-234/17); Skeyes v Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd (C-353/20); FMS and Others v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság Dél-alföldi Regionális Igazgatóság and Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság (C-924/19 PPU, C-925/19 PPU); Asociaţia 'Forumul Judecătorilor din România' and Asociaţia 'Mişcarea pentru Apărarea Statutului Procurorilor' v Parchetul de pe lângă Înalta Curte de Casaţie şi Justiţie – Procurorul General al României (C-53/23); Across Fiduciaria SpA and Others v Presidenza del Consiglio dei ministri and Others (C-684/24); PROFIL-COPY 2002 Irodatechnikai Kft. v Közigazgatási és Területfejlesztési Minisztérium (C-510/24); Royal Football Club Seraing v Fédération internationale de football association (FIFA) and Others (C-600/23); Criminal proceedings against P.B. and R.S (C-646/23)2 provisions; IG v Varhoven administrativen sad (C-289/21); Anglo Austrian AAB AG, formerly Anglo Austrian AAB Bank AG and Belegging-Maatschappij 'Far-East' BV v European Central Bank (T-797/19); ORLEN KolTrans sp. z o.o. v Prezes Urzędu Transportu Kolejowego (C-563/20); Diskrimineringsombudsmannen v Braathens Regional Aviation AB (C-30/19); „Linas Agro“ AB v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (C-117/19); European Commission v Hungary (C-771/18); SL v Vueling Airlines SA (C-86/19); Deutsche Lufthansa AG v Land Berlin (C-379/18); CRM Srl v European Commission (T-43/15); Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej and Petrotel sp. z o.o. w Płocku v Polkomtel sp. z o.o (C-231/15); État belge, SPF Finances v NN (L) International (C-48/15)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; The Queen v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte: Factortame Ltd and others (C-213/89); Peterbroeck, Van Campenhout & Cie SCS v Belgian State (C-312/93); The Queen, on the application of ABNA Ltd and Others v Secretary of State for Health and Food Standards Agency, Fratelli Martini & C. SpA and Cargill Srl v Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali and Others, Ferrari Mangimi Srl and Associazione nazionale tra i produttori di alimenti zootecnici (Assalzoo) v Ministero delle Politiche Agricole e Forestali and Others and Nederlandse Vereniging Diervoederindustrie (Nevedi) v Productschap Diervoeder (C-453/03, C-11/04, C-12/04, C-194/04); Marguerite Johnston v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary (222/84); Rewe-Zentralfinanz eG and Rewe-Zentral AG v Landwirtschaftskammer für das Saarland (33/76); Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v Simmenthal SpA (106/77); Union nationale des entraîneurs et cadres techniques professionnels du football (Unectef) v Georges Heylens and others (222/86); Zuckerfabrik Süderdithmarschen AG v Hauptzollamt Itzehoe and Zuckerfabrik Soest GmbH v Hauptzollamt Paderborn (C-143/88, C-92/89); Irène Vlassopoulou v Ministerium für Justiz, Bundes- und Europaangelegenheiten Baden-Württemberg (C-340/89); Atlanta Fruchthandelsgesellschaft mbH and others v Bundesamt für Ernährung und Forstwirtschaft (C-465/93); Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (C-424/99); Ministero delle Finanze v Eribrand SpA (C-467/01); Courage Ltd v Bernard Crehan and Bernard Crehan v Courage Ltd and Others (C-453/99); Comet BV v Produktschap voor Siergewassen (45/76); A. Verholen and others v Sociale Verzekeringsbank Amsterdam (C-87/90, C-88/90, C-89/90); Rewe-Handelsgesellschaft Nord mbH and Rewe-Markt Steffen v Hauptzollamt Kiel (158/80); Siples Srl, in liquidation v Ministero delle Finanze and Servizio della Riscossione dei Tributi - Concessione Provincia di Genova - San Paolo Riscossioni Genova SpA (C-226/99); Safalero Srl v Prefetto di Genova (C-13/01); Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council of the European Union (C-50/00 P)