Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
European Commission v Maria Dolores Fernández Gómez (C-417/05 P)
Judgment
The appeal
The first plea
45

European Commission v Maria Dolores Fernández Gómez (C-417/05 P)

Judgment of 14 Sept 2006law://eu/cjeu/2005/c-417-05/para_45@2026-11-11

45In addition, the letter of 12 May 2003 itself does not contain, in relation to those terms, any new information regarding the date of expiry of the respondent's contract and the issue of that contract's renewal.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-417/05 P · ECLI:EU:C:2006:582
Decided: 14 Sept 2006
Procedure: staff cases inadmissible
Ruled invalid: 62003TJ0272
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities
Defendant: Maria Dolores Fernández Gómez
Rapporteur: G. Arestis
Advocate General: L.A. Geelhoed
Bench: 5 judges
C.W.A. Timmermans, R. Schintgen, P. Kūris, G. Arestis, J. Klučka
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62005CJ0417

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

14 Sept 2006Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Maria Dolores Fernández Gómez v European Commission (T-272/03)
Cited by 23: KF v European Investment Bank (T-330/24); TO v European Union Agency for Asylum (T-727/21); SV v European Investment Bank (T-311/21); ON v European Commission (T-730/20); KF v European Union Satellite Centre (C-464/20); IZ v European Parliament (T-155/20); IY v European Parliament (T-154/20); JA v European Parliament (T-156/20); European Commission v RQ (C-831/18 P); Raivo Teeäär v European Central Bank (T-547/18); ZQ v European Commission (T-647/18); VG, as heir of MS v European Commission (T-314/16, T-435/16); Jasenko Selimovic v European Parliament (T-61/17); HF v European Parliament (T-218/17); HQ v Community Plant Variety Office (T-592/16); HN v European Commission (T-588/16); HF v European Parliament (T-584/16)2 provisions; HF v European Parliament (T-570/16); Luisa Opreana v European Commission (F-67/15); European Commission v Kingdom of the Netherlands and ING Groep NV (C-224/12 P)2 provisions; Ulrik Solberg v European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) (F-124/12); Yannick Munch v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (F-6/10); Kelly-Marie Bennett and Others v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (F-102/09)
Cites 6: Giuseppe Grasselli v European Commission (23/80); Marco Castagnoli v European Commission (329/85); Maria Dolores Fernández Gómez v European Commission (T-272/03); Fiorenzo Contini v European Commission (C-95/87); Maria Dolores Fernández Gómez v Commission of the European Communities (T-272/03); Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials)