Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Jacques Wunenburger v European Commission (C-362/05 P)
Judgment
The cross-appeal
Findings of the Court
The merits of the cross-appeal
52

Jacques Wunenburger v European Commission (C-362/05 P)

Judgment of 7 Jun 2007law://eu/cjeu/2005/c-362-05/para_52@2026-11-10

52However, that interest in bringing proceedings can only exist if the alleged unlawfulness is liable to recur in the future independently of the circumstances of the case which gave rise to the action brought by the appellant.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Fourth Chamber
Case: C-362/05 P · ECLI:EU:C:2007:322
Decided: 7 Jun 2007
Procedure: Appeal
Applicant: Jacques Wunenburger
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: K. Lenaerts
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 5 judges
K. Lenaerts, R. Silva de Lapuerta, G. Arestis, J. Malenovský, T. von Danwitz
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62005CJ0362

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

7 Jun 2007Reading

Connections

Cited by 25: SAS Cargo Group A/S and Others v European Commission (T-313/21); Air Canada v European Commission (T-310/21); Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) v European Commission (T-412/22); Aurelia Stiftung v European Commission (T-565/23); Pollinis France v European Commission (T-94/23); YL v Council of the European Union and European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-435/23); European Central Bank and European Commission v Francesca Corneli (C-777/22); ClientEarth AISBL v Council of the European Union (T-577/22); EG v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (T-321/24); TB v European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (T-560/21); Nemea Bank plc v European Central Bank (ECB) and Others (C-181/22 P); Unione Italiana Vini Servizi Soc. coop. arl (UIV Servizi) v European Research Executive Agency (T-440/22); PH and Others v European Central Bank (T-323/22); Aluminios Cortizo, SAU and Cortizo Cartera, SL v European Commission (T-1/14); European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Indo European Foods Ltd (C-801/21 P); Decal España, SA v European Commission (T-509/14); Duro Felguera, SA and Others v European Commission (T-401/14); Naturgy Energy Group, SA, formerly Gas Natural SDG, SA v European Commission (T-508/14); Caixabank, SA and Others v European Commission (T-700/13); Hispavima, SL v European Commission (T-514/14); Grupo Morera & Vallejo, SL and DSA, Defensa y Servicios del Asegurado, SA v European Commission (T-519/14); EO v European Commission (T-623/18); Telefónica Gestión Integral de Edificios y Servicios, SL, formerly Taetel, SL and Banco Santander, SA, formerly Banco Popular Español, SA v European Commission (T-29/14); Jean-Marc Colombani v European External Action Service (C-595/22); TC v European Parliament (T-309/21)
Cites 24: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Nederlandse Federatieve Vereniging voor de Groothandel op Elektrotechnisch Gebied v Commission of the European Communities (C-105/04 P); Interporc Im- und Export GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-41/00 P); SpA Simmenthal v Commission of the European Communities (92/78); Karl Könecke Fleischwarenfabrik GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (76/79); Technische Unie BV v Commission of the European Communities (C-113/04 P); Rendo NV, Centraal Overijsselse Nutsbedrijven NV and Regionaal Energiebedrijf Salland NV v Commission of the European Communities (C-19/93 P); General Motors BV v Commission of the European Communities (C-551/03); Jacques Wunenburger v Commission of the European Communities (T-370/03); Osman Ocalan, on behalf of the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) and Serif Vanly, on behalf of the Kurdistan National Congress (KNK) v Council of the European Union (C-229/05 P); AKZO Chemie BV and AKZO Chemie UK Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (53/85); Asociación Profesional de Empresarios de Pesca Comunitarios (Apesco) v Commission of the European Communities (207/86); European Investment Bank v Michel Hautem (C-449/99 P); JCB Service v Commission of the European Communities (C-167/04 P); Olli Mattila v Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities (C-353/01 P); European Parliament v Pierre Richard (C-174/99 P); Srl Bensider and others v Commission of the European Communities (50/84); Commission of the European Communities v T-Mobile Austria GmbH (C-141/02 P); Koninklijke Coöperatie Cosun UA v Commission of the European Communities (C-68/05 P); Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union (C-61/96, C-132/97, C-45/98, C-27/99, C-81/00, C-22/01); Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials); Council of the European Union v Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica GmbH and C. H. Boehringer Sohn (C-23/00 P); Volkswagen AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-338/00 P); Laboratoires pharmaceutiques Bergaderm SA and Jean-Jacques Goupil v Commission of the European Communities (C-352/98 P)