41In dismissing the plea that there was no need to adjudicate raised by the Commission, the Court of First Instance held, first, at paragraph 19 of the judgment under appeal, that the dispute still had a purpose inasmuch as the appointment decision produced effects and that the decision to reject the candidature continued to produce effects. Secondly, the Court of First Instance held, at paragraph 20 of the judgment under appeal that the appellant retained an interest in bringing proceedings in order to ensure that the alleged unlawfulness would not recur in the future in a similar procedure to that at issue.
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.