Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Commission of the European Communities v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-299/05)
Judgment
Merits
Findings of the Court
70

Commission of the European Communities v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (C-299/05)

Judgment of 18 Oct 2007law://eu/cjeu/2005/c-299-05/para_70@2026-11-12

70The fact that the DLA, AA and CA, unlike the benefit at issue in Jauch and Hosse, do not have as there the essential purpose supplementing sickness insurance benefits does not affect the categorisation of those allowances.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-299/05 · ECLI:EU:C:2007:608
Decided: 18 Oct 2007
Procedure: Action for annulment
Ruled invalid: Regulation 2005/647
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities
Defendants: European Parliament; Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: Bonichot
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 4 judges
C.W.A. Timmermans, J. Makarczyk, P. Kūris, C. Toader
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62005CJ0299

Topics

Social security

History · 1 version

18 Oct 2007Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Regulation (EC) No 647/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2005 amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community and (EEC) No 574/72 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71
Cited by 15: SV v European Investment Bank (T-311/21); NRW. Bank v Single Resolution Board (SRB) (C-662/19 P)4 provisions; Front populaire pour la libération de la Saguia el-Hamra et du Rio de oro (Front Polisario) v Council of the European Union (T-279/19); Sigrid Dickmanns v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-63/20); Kingdom of Sweden v European Commission (T-837/16); Systema Teknolotzis AE - Efarmogon Ilektronikis kai Pliroforikis v European Commission (T-234/15); Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Tolley (deceased, acting in the proceedings by her personal representative) (C-430/15)3 provisions; Italian Republic v European Commission (T-295/13); European Commission v Slovak Republic (C-433/13); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v European Central Bank (ECB) (T-496/11)2 provisions; Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-481/11)2 provisions; Associazione Nazionale degli Industriali delle Conserve Alimentari Vegetali (Anicav) and Others v European Commission (T-454/10, T-482/11)2 provisions; Joao Filipe da Silva Martins v Bank Betriebskrankenkasse - Pflegekasse (C-388/09)2 provisions; European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany (C-206/10)2 provisions; Ralph James Bartlett and Others v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (C-537/09)
Cites 15: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community; J. C. J. Wouters, J. W. Savelbergh and Price Waterhouse Belastingadviseurs BV v Algemene Raad van de Nederlandse Orde van Advocaten, intervener: Raad van de Balies van de Europese Gemeenschap (C-309/99); Manfred Molenaar and Barbara Fath-Molenaar v Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse Baden-Württemberg (C-160/96); Arnold André GmbH & Co. KG v Landrat des Kreises Herford (C-434/02); The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health (C-210/03); Vera Hoeckx v Openbaar Centrum voor Maatschappelijk Welzijn, Kalmthout (249/83); Regulation (EC) No 647/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2005 amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community and (EEC) No 574/72 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71; Rose Hughes v Chief Adjudication Officer, Belfast (C-78/91); Friedrich Jauch v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter (C-215/99); J. J. Kersbergen-Lap and D. Dams-Schipper v Raad van Bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen (C-154/05); Kelvin Albert Snares v Adjudication Officer (C-20/96); Roger Stanton Newton v Chief Adjudication Officer (C-356/89); Ansaldo Energia SpA v Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato, Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v Marine Insurance Consultants Srl and GMB Srl and Others v Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato (C-279/96, C-280/96, C-281/96); Silvia Hosse v Land Salzburg (C-286/03)