Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
D. P. W. Hendrix v Raad van Bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen (C-287/05)
Judgment
The questions referred for a prelimina…
The second and third questions
Findings of the Court
54

D. P. W. Hendrix v Raad van Bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen (C-287/05)

Judgment of 11 Sept 2007law://eu/cjeu/2005/c-287-05/para_54@2026-11-11

54It follows that the condition of residence attached to receipt of the benefit under the Wajong can be put forward against a person in the situation of Mr Hendrix only if it is objectively justified and proportionate to the objective pursued.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-287/05 · ECLI:EU:C:2007:494
Decided: 11 Sept 2007
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicant: D.P.W. Hendrix
Defendant: Raad van Bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen
Rapporteur: J.-C Bonichot
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 13 judges
V. Skouris, P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas, K. Lenaerts, P. Kūris, E. Juhász, G. Arestis, A. Borg Barthet, M. Ilešič, J. Malenovský, U. Lõhmus, J.-C Bonichot
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62005CJ0287

Topics

Freedom of movement for workers Non-discrimination on grounds of nationality Social security

History · 1 version

11 Sept 2007Reading

Connections

Interprets 3: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community; Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community
Cited by 11: Noémie Depesme and Others v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la recherche (C-401/15, C-402/15, C-403/15); Maria do Céu Bragança Linares Verruga and Others v Ministre de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la recherche (C-238/15)2 provisions; Elodie Giersch and Others v État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (C-20/12)2 provisions; Caves Krier Frères Sàrl v Directeur de l’Administration de l’emploi (C-379/11)2 provisions; Déborah Prete v Office national de l’emploi (C-367/11)2 provisions; Joao Filipe da Silva Martins v Bank Betriebskrankenkasse - Pflegekasse (C-388/09)2 provisions; Ralph James Bartlett and Others v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (C-537/09)2 provisions; Ketty Leyman v Institut national d'assurance maladie-invalidité (INAMI) (C-3/08); Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-269/07); R. H. H. Renneberg v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-527/06); Doris Habelt, Martha Möser and Peter Wachter v Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund (C-396/05, C-419/05, C-450/05)2 provisions
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community; Bernhard Pfeiffer, Wilhelm Roith, Albert Süß, Michael Winter, Klaus Nestvogel, Roswitha Zeller and Matthias Döbele v Deutsches Rotes Kreuz, Kreisverband Waldshut eV (C-397/01, C-398/01, C-399/01, C-400/01, C-401/01, C-402/01, C-403/01); Marleasing SA v La Comercial Internacional de Alimentacion SA (C-106/89); María Martínez Sala v Freistaat Bayern (C-85/96); Georgios Alevizos v Ypourgos Oikonomikon (C-392/05); Hans-Jürgen Ritter-Coulais and Monique Ritter-Coulais v Finanzamt Germersheim (C-152/03); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (C-205/04); H. Meints v Minister van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij (C-57/96); Gertraud Hartmann v Freistaat Bayern (C-212/05); Friedrich Jauch v Pensionsversicherungsanstalt der Arbeiter (C-215/99); Ministre de l'Intérieur v Aitor Oteiza Olazabal (C-100/01); J. J. Kersbergen-Lap and D. Dams-Schipper v Raad van Bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen (C-154/05); Council Regulation (EEC) No 1247/92 of 30 April 1992 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self- employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community; Council Regulation (EC) No 1223/98 of 4 June 1998 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community and Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71; Vera A. Partridge v Adjudication Officer (C-297/96); C.P.M. Meeusen v Hoofddirectie van de Informatie Beheer Groep (C-337/97); Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996 amending and updating Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community and Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71; Vera Hoeckx v Openbaar Centrum voor Maatschappelijk Welzijn, Kalmthout (249/83); Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community