60It is clear from the case-law cited in paragraphs 54 and 55 of this judgment that the appellant ought, on any view of the matter, to have demonstrated that the contested decision was likely to substantially affect its position on the market In the course of its unappealable assessment of the facts, the Court of First Instance concluded that in this case the appellant had not demonstrated that the contested decision was likely to harm its legitimate interests by substantially affecting its position on the market For the reasons set out in paragraphs 34 to 40 of this judgment, none of the arguments advanced by the appellant in support of the first ground of appeal can call into question that conclusion.
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.