Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxemburg (C-23/05)
Judgment
5

Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxemburg (C-23/05)

Judgment of 27 Oct 2005law://eu/cjeu/2005/c-23-05/para_5@2026-11-10

5Article 92(2) of the Rules of Procedure provides that the Court may at any time of its own motion consider whether there exists any absolute bar to proceeding with a case.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Sixth Chamber
Case: C-23/05 · ECLI:EU:C:2005:660
Decided: 27 Oct 2005
Procedure: Infringement action
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities
Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Rapporteur: A. Borg Barthet
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 3 judges
J.-P. Puissochet, S. von Bahr, A. Borg Barthet
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62005CJ0023

Topics

History · 1 version

27 Oct 2005Reading

Connections

Cited by 23: European Commission v Italian Republic (C-297/08)2 provisions; European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-642/18)2 provisions; European Commission v Portuguese Republic (C-290/18); European Commission v Romania (C-104/15); European Commission v Italian Republic (C-323/13); European Commission v French Republic (C-164/11); European Commission v Republic of Austria (C-352/11); European Commission v Republic of Poland (C-311/10); European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-397/10); European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxemburg (C-390/10); European Commission v Ireland (C-431/10); European Commission v Hellenic Republic (C-534/09); European Commission v Hellenic Republic (C-24/10); European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-6/10); European Commission v Republic of Austria (C-189/09); European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxemburg (C-8/10); European Commission v Czech Republic (C-378/09); European Commission v Ireland (C-294/09); European Commission v French Republic (C-170/09); European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-120/09); European Commission v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (C-390/07); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-13/09); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Belgium (C-7/09)
Cites 7: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-31/69); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-341/97); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-230/99); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-322/00); Directive 2000/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 2000 amending Council Directive 93/104/EC concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time to cover sectors and activities excluded from that Directive; Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-323/01)