Judgment_paragraph 34 · Eurohypo AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-439/04)

34In order to show that the element ‘hypo’ is a common abbreviation, OHIM produces, in the annex to its response, the results of an internet search which are admissible because the applicant already had, given the findings set out in the contested decision, all the information necessary to comprehend the decision and to challenge its legality before the Court (Case T-173/00 KWS Saat v OHIM (Shade of orange) [2002] ECR II-3843, paragraph 56 et seq., and Case T-216/02 Fieldturf v OHIM (LOOKS LIKE GRASS... FEELS LIKE GRASS... PLAYS LIKE GRASS) [2004] ECR II-1023, paragraph 41).

Eurohypo AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-439/04)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections