Judgment_paragraph 29 · Koipe Corporación, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-363/04)

29As far as the second part of the head of claim is concerned, the applicant essentially requests the Court to adopt the decision that it claims OHIM should have taken, namely that the conditions for opposition have been fulfilled, in order that OHIM enforce it by refusing registration of the mark applied for.

Koipe Corporación, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-363/04)

Koipe Corporación, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-363/04)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections