Sadas SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-346/04)

Judgment of 24 Nov 2005

law://eu/cjeu/2004/t-346-04/para_19@2026-11-14

19Those documents, produced for the first time before the Court, cannot therefore be taken into consideration. The purpose of actions before the Court of First Instance is to review the legality of decisions of the Boards of Appeal of OHIM for the purposes of Article 63 of Regulation No 40/94, so it is not the Court's function to review the facts in the light of documents produced for the first time before it. Accordingly, the abovementioned documents must be excluded, without it being necessary to assess their probative value (Case T-10/03 Koubi v OHIM — Flabesa (CONFORFLEX) [2004] ECR II-719, paragraph 52; Case T-399/02 Eurocermex v OHIM (Shape of a beer bottle) [2004] ECR II-1391, paragraph 52; Case T-396/02 Storck v OHIM (Shape of a sweet) [2004] ECR II-3821, paragraph 24; and Case T-164/03 Ampafrance v OHIM — Johnson & Johnson (monBéBé) [2005] ECR II-1401, paragraph 29).

Sadas SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-346/04)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections