Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

European Union
Criminal proceedings against Leopold Henri Van Esbroeck (C-436/04)
Judgment
The second question
36

Criminal proceedings against Leopold Henri Van Esbroeck (C-436/04)

law://eu/cjeu/2004/c-436-04/para_36@2026-11-13

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-436/04 · ECLI:EU:C:2006:165
Decided: 9 Mar 2006
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Hof van Cassatie (Belgium)
Defendant: Leopold Henri Van Esbroeck
Rapporteur: R. Schintgen
Advocate General: D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer
Bench: 5 judges
C.W.A. Timmermans, R. Schintgen, R. Silva de Lapuerta, G. Arestis, J. Klučka
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62004CJ0436

Topics

Closer cooperation Justice and home affairs

History · 1 version

9 Mar 2006Reading

Judgment of 9 Mar 2006

36In those circumstances, the only relevant criterion for the application of Article 54 of the CISA is identity of the material acts, understood in the sense of the existence of a set of concrete circumstances which are inextricably linked together.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Connections

Cited by 11: NK v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Feldkirch (C-55/22); Criminal proceedings against Giuseppe Francesco Gasparini and Others (C-467/04)2 provisions; Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde v Nordzucker AG and Others (C-151/20)2 provisions; X (C-665/20 PPU); Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów (C-617/17)2 provisions; Zoran Spasic (C-129/14 PPU); Gaetano Mantello (C-261/09)2 provisions; Criminal proceedings against Vladimir Turanský (C-491/07); Criminal proceedings against Jürgen Kretzinger (C-288/05)2 provisions; Criminal proceedings against Norma Kraaijenbrink (C-367/05)2 provisions; Jean Leon Van Straaten v Staat der Nederlanden and Republiek Italië (C-150/05)2 provisions
Cites 6: Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); Criminal proceedings against Hüseyin Gözütok and Klaus Brügge (C-187/01, C-385/01); Criminal proceedings against Filomeno Mario Miraglia (C-469/03); 1999/436/EC: Council Decision of 20 May 1999 determining, in conformity with the relevant provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Community and the Treaty on European Union, the legal basis for each of the provisions or decisions which constitute the Schengen acquis; 2000/777/EC: Council Decision of 1 December 2000 on the application of the Schengen acquis in Denmark, Finland and Sweden, and in Iceland and Norway - Declarations