Commission of the European Communities v Édith Cresson (C-432/04)

Judgment of 11 Jul 2006

law://eu/cjeu/2004/c-432-04/para_50@2026-11-13

50In that regard, it should be noted that the Court may, of its own motion, on a proposal from the Advocate General or at the request of the parties, order the reopening of the oral procedure in accordance with Article 61 of the Rules of Procedure, if it considers that it lacks sufficient information or that the case should be decided on the basis of an argument which has not been discussed between the parties (see, inter alia, order of 4 February 2000 in Case C-17/98 Emesa Sugar [2000] ECR I-665, paragraph 18, and Case C-210/03 Swedish Match [2004] ECR I-11893, paragraph 25).

Commission of the European Communities v Édith Cresson (C-432/04)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections