Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
The Queen, on the application of Teleos plc and Others v Commissioners of Customs & Excise (C-409/04)
Judgment
The questions referred for a prelimina…
The first and second questions
34

The Queen, on the application of Teleos plc and Others v Commissioners of Customs & Excise (C-409/04)

Judgment of 27 Sept 2007law://eu/cjeu/2004/c-409-04/para_34@2026-11-11

34In those circumstances, in view of the necessary correlation between intra-Community supply and acquisition, the two provisions mentioned in the preceding paragraph must be interpreted in such a way as to confer on them identical meaning and scope.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-409/04 · ECLI:EU:C:2007:548
Decided: 27 Sept 2007
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicants: The Queen; Teleos PLC and 13 more
Unique Distribution Ltd; Synectiv Ltd; New Communications Ltd; Quest Trading Company Ltd; Phones International Ltd; AGM Associates Ltd; DVD Components Ltd; Fonecomp Ltd; Bulk GSM Ltd; Libratech Ltd; Rapid Marketing Services Ltd; Earthshine Ltd; Stardex (UK) Ltd
Defendant: Commissioners of Customs & Excise
Rapporteur: U. Lõhmus
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 5 judges
A. Rosas, A. Borg Barthet, J. Malenovský, U. Lõhmus, A. Ó Caoimh
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62004CJ0409

Topics

Value added tax

History · 1 version

27 Sept 2007Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment
Cited by 20: Herst s.r.o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství (C-401/18); Finanzamt Österreich v D GmbH (T-638/24); P sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Lublinie (C-442/22); Climate Corporation Emissions Trading GmbH v Finanzamt Österreich (C-641/21); Skatteministeriet v KPC Herning (C-71/18); AREX CZ a.s. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství (C-414/17); Cartrans Spedition Srl v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Ploieşti - Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Prahova and Direcţia Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti - Administraţia Fiscală pentru Contribuabili Mijlocii (C-495/17); Milan Božičevič Ježovnik v Republika Slovenija (C-528/17)2 provisions; UAB „Enteco Baltic“ v Muitinės departamentas prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (C-108/17); Vion Livestock BV v Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken (C-383/16); SC Paper Consult SRL v Direcţia Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca and Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Bistriţa Năsăud (C-101/16); ‘Toridas’ UAB v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (C-386/16)2 provisions; Santogal M-Comércio e Reparação de Automóveis Lda v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira (C-26/16); UAB „Litdana“ v Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos (C-624/15); Traum EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ Varna pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite (C-492/13); BDV Hungary Trading Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Közép-magyarországi Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága (C-563/12)2 provisions; Město Žamberk v Finanční ředitelství v Hradci Králové, now Odvolací finanční ředitelství (C-18/12)2 provisions; Vogtländische Straßen-, Tief- und Rohrleitungsbau GmbH Rodewisch (VSTR) v Finanzamt Plauen (C-587/10); Mecsek-Gabona Kft v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Dél-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága (C-273/11)2 provisions; Mahagében Kft v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Dél-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága and Péter Dávid v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Észak-alföldi Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága (C-80/11, C-142/11)
Cites 19: Halifax plc, Leeds Permanent Development Services Ltd and County Wide Property Investments Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise (C-255/02); Gemeente Leusden and Holin Groep BV cs v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-487/01, C-7/02); Administration de l'enregistrement et des domaines v Eurodental Sàrl (C-240/05); Axel Kittel v Belgian State and Belgian State v Recolta Recycling SPRL (C-439/04, C-440/04); Commissioners of Customs & Excise and Attorney General v Federation of Technological Industries and Others (C-384/04); Optigen Ltd, Fulcrum Electronics Ltd and Bond House Systems Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise (C-354/03, C-355/03, C-484/03); Sparekassernes Datacenter (SDC) v Skatteministeriet (C-2/95); Pascoal & Filhos Ldª v Fazenda Pública (C-97/95); The Queen v Commissioners of Customs & Excise, ex parte Faroe Seafood Co. Ltd, Føroya Fiskasøla L/F and Commissioners of Customs & Excise, ex parte John Smith and Celia Smith trading as Arthur Smith (a firm) (C-153/94, C-204/94); Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment; Council Directive 91/680/EEC of 16 December 1991 supplementing the common system of value added tax and amending Directive 77/388/EEC with a view to the abolition of fiscal frontiers; EMAG Handel Eder OHG v Finanzlandesdirektion für Kärnten (C-245/04); Gabalfrisa SL and Others v Agencia Estatal de Administración Tributaria (AEAT) (C-110/98, C-111/98, C-112/98, C-113/98, C-114/98, C-115/98, C-116/98, C-117/98, C-118/98, C-119/98, C-120/98, C-121/98, C-122/98, C-123/98, C-124/98, C-125/98, C-126/98, C-127/98, C-128/98, C-129/98, C-130/98, C-131/98, C-132/98, C-133/98, C-134/98, C-135/98, C-136/98, C-137/98, C-138/98, C-139/98, C-140/98, C-141/98, C-142/98, C-143/98, C-144/98, C-145/98, C-146/98, C-147/98); Velvet & Steel Immobilien und Handels GmbH v Finanzamt Hamburg-Eimsbüttel (C-455/05); Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Velker International Oil Company Ltd NV (C-185/89); BLP Group plc v Commissioners of Customs & Excise (C-4/94); Schmeink & Cofreth AG & Co. KG v Finanzamt Borken and Manfred Strobel v Finanzamt Esslingen (C-454/98); Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities (326/85); Garage Molenheide BVBA, Peter Schepens, Bureau Rik Decan-Business Research & Development NV (BRD) and Sanders BVBA v Belgische Staat (C-286/94, C-340/95, C-401/95, C-47/96)