Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
SGL Carbon AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-308/04)
Judgment
The appeal
First plea: failure to have regard to…
Arguments of the parties
20

SGL Carbon AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-308/04)

Judgment of 29 Jun 2006law://eu/cjeu/2004/c-308-04/para_20@2026-11-12

20In support of its argument, the appellant relies in particular on Case 7/72 Boehringer Mannheim v Commission [1972] ECR 1281.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-308/04 · ECLI:EU:C:2006:433
Decided: 29 Jun 2006
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: SGL Carbon AG
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: R. Silva de Lapuerta
Advocate General: L.A. Geelhoed
Bench: 5 judges
C.W.A. Timmermans, R. Silva de Lapuerta, P. Kūris, G. Arestis, J. Klučka
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62004CJ0308

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

29 Jun 2006Reading

Connections

Cited by 20: Harley-Davidson Europe Ltd and Neovia Logistics Services International v European Commission (C-297/23 P)2 provisions; Harley-Davidson Europe Ltd and Neovia Logistics Services International v European Commission (T-324/21); Nichicon Corporation v European Commission (T-342/18); Sony Optiarc, Inc and Sony Optiarc America, Inc v European Commission (T-763/15); Quanta Storage, Inc. v European Commission (T-772/15); Sony Corporation and Sony Electronics, Inc v European Commission (T-762/15); Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Corp. and Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corp. v European Commission (T-8/16); Aloys F. Dornbracht GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (C-604/13 P); Topps Europe Ltd v European Commission (T-699/14); Goldfish BV and Others v European Commission (T-54/14); SKW Stahl-Metallurgie GmbH and SKW Stahl-Metallurgie Holding AG v European Commission (C-154/14 P); Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, SA and Others v European Commission (T-426/10); Panasonic Corp. and MT Picture Display Co. Ltd v European Commission (T-82/13); Trafilerie Meridionali SpA v European Commission (T-422/10)2 provisions; Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission (T-393/10)2 provisions; Fapricela - Indústria de Trefilaria, SA v European Commission (T-398/10); InnoLux Corp. v European Commission (C-231/14 P); Pilkington Group Ltd and Others v European Commission (T-72/09); Donau Chemie AG v European Commission (T-406/09)2 provisions; Saint-Gobain Glass France SA and Others v European Commission (T-56/09, T-73/09)2 provisions
Cites 16: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); Thyssen Stahl AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-194/99 P); EEC Council: Regulation No 17: First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty; Tokai Carbon Co. Ltd and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-236/01, T-239/01, T-244/01, T-245/01, T-246/01, T-251/01, T-252/01); European Parliament v Carlo Ripa di Meana, Leoluca Orlando and Gastone Parigi (C-470/00 P); Allgemeine Elektrizitäts-Gesellschaft AEG-Telefunken AG v Commission of the European Communities (107/82); NV IAZ International Belgium and others v Commission of the European Communities (96/82, 97/82, 98/82, 99/82, 100/82, 101/82, 102/82, 104/82, 105/82, 108/82, 110/82); Max Gutmann v Commission of the EAEC (C-18/65, C-35/65); Boehringer Mannheim GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (7/72); 2002/271/EC: Commission Decision of 18 July 2001 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Case COMP/E-1/36.490 — Graphite electrodes (Text with EEA relevance.)(notified under document number C(2001) 1986); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P); NV Nederlandsche Banden Industrie Michelin v Commission of the European Communities (322/81); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80); ACF Chemiefarma NV v Commission of the European Communities (41/69)