Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Office national de l'emploi v Ioannis Ioannidis (C-258/04)
Judgment
The question referred for a preliminar…
34

Office national de l'emploi v Ioannis Ioannidis (C-258/04)

Judgment of 15 Sept 2005law://eu/cjeu/2004/c-258-04/para_34@2026-11-11

34It must be added that the tideover allowance constitutes a social advantage within the meaning of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 1612/68 (D'Hoop, paragraph 17).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-258/04 · ECLI:EU:C:2005:559
Decided: 15 Sept 2005
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Cour du travail de Liège (Belgium)
Applicant: Office national de l'emploi
Defendant: Ioannis Ioannidis
Rapporteur: J.N. Cunha Rodrigues
Advocate General: D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer
Bench: 5 judges
P. Jann, N. Colneric, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, M. Ilešič, E. Levits Judges
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62004CJ0258

Topics

Citizenship of the Union Freedom of movement for workers Non-discrimination on grounds of nationality

History · 1 version

15 Sept 2005Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 6: Land Oberösterreich v ČEZ as (C-115/08); UB v Generálny riaditeľ Sociálnej poisťovne Bratislava (C-447/18)2 provisions; Déborah Prete v Office national de l’emploi (C-367/11)2 provisions; Petra von Chamier-Glisczinski v Deutsche Angestellten-Krankenkasse (C-208/07); Athanasios Vatsouras and Josif Koupatantze v Arbeitsgemeinschaft (ARGE) Nürnberg 900 (C-22/08); Adam Opel AG v Autec AG (C-48/05)2 provisions
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; The Queen, on the application of Dany Bidar v London Borough of Ealing and Secretary of State for Education and Skills (C-209/03); Giovanni Maria Sotgiu v Deutsche Bundespost (152/73); Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community; Marie-Nathalie D'Hoop v Office national de l'emploi (C-224/98); SARPP - Société d'application et de recherches en pharmacologie et phytotherapie SARL v Chambre syndicale des raffineurs et conditionneurs de sucre de France and others (C-241/89); Michel Trojani v Centre public d'aide sociale de Bruxelles (CPAS) (C-456/02); C.P.M. Meeusen v Hoofddirectie van de Informatie Beheer Groep (C-337/97); Brian Francis Collins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (C-138/02); Anita Cristini v Société nationale des chemins de fer français (32/75); Office national de l'emploi v Joszef Deak (94/84); John O'Flynn v Adjudication Officer (C-237/94)