Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-255/04)
Judgment
The action
The third part of the first head of co…
25

Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-255/04)

Judgment of 15 Jun 2006law://eu/cjeu/2004/c-255-04/para_25@2026-11-12

25In the present case, whilst the Commission refers to the complaint in question in the grounds of its application, it does not include it in its heads of claim. As it is not one of the complaints which are the subject of its application, that complaint must be regarded as inadmissible.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-255/04 · ECLI:EU:C:2006:401
Decided: 15 Jun 2006
Procedure: Infringement action
Applicant: Commission of the European Communities
Defendant: French Republic
Rapporteur: P. Jann
Advocate General: M. Poiares Maduro
Bench: 5 judges
P. Jann, N. Colneric, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, M. Ilešič, E. Levits
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62004CJ0255

Topics

Freedom of establishment Freedom of movement for workers Freedom to provide services

History · 1 version

15 Jun 2006Reading

Connections

Cited by 16: Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Wiener Landesregierung and Oberösterreichische Landesregierung (C-169/07); Nord Vest Pro Sani Pro SRL v Administraţia Judeţeană a Finanţelor Publice Satu Mare and Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Cluj-Napoca (C-387/22); European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (C-576/22)2 provisions; Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharma EEIG v European Commission and European Medicines Agency (T-329/16); Jyske Bank Gibraltar Ltd v Administración del Estado (C-212/11)2 provisions; European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-577/10)2 provisions; European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (C-132/09)3 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (C-154/08); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-260/04)2 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (C-501/04); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Spain (C-235/04)2 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland (C-195/04)2 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (C-64/04); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of the Netherlands (C-34/04); Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (C-251/04)2 provisions; Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (C-257/05)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)5 provisions; Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community; Peterbroeck, Van Campenhout & Cie SCS v Belgian State (C-312/93); Finalarte Sociedade de Construção Civil Ldª, Portugaia Construções Ldª and Engil Sociedade de Construção Civil SA v Urlaubs- und Lohnausgleichskasse der Bauwirtschaft and Urlaubs- und Lohnausgleichskasse der Bauwirtschaft v Amilcar Oliveira Rocha, Tudor Stone Ltd, Tecnamb-Tecnologia do Ambiante Ldª, Turiprata Construções Civil Ldª, Duarte dos Santos Sousa and Santos & Kewitz Construções Ldª (C-49/98, C-50/98, C-52/98, C-53/98, C-54/98, C-68/98, C-69/98, C-70/98, C-71/98); Graziana Luisi and Giuseppe Carbone v Ministero del Tesoro (286/82, 26/83); Commission of the European Communities v Ireland (C-13/00); Meroni & Co., Erba - Meroni & Co., Milan v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community (C-46/59, C-47/59); Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (C-171/02); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-296/01); Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Denmark (C-52/90); Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic (C-347/88); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-262/02); Société Civile Agricole du Centre d'Insémination de la Crespelle v Coopérative d'Elevage et d'Insémination Artificielle du Département de la Mayenne (C-323/93); Inasti (Institut National d'Assurances Sociales pour Travailleurs Indépendants) v Hans Kemmler (C-53/95); Manfred Säger v Dennemeyer & Co. Ltd (C-76/90); Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organization of working time; P. H. Asscher v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-107/94); Barry Banks and Others v Theatre royal de la Monnaie (C-178/97)