Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Enirisorse SpA v Sotacarbo SpA (C-237/04)
Judgment
The first question
27

Enirisorse SpA v Sotacarbo SpA (C-237/04)

Judgment of 23 Mar 2006law://eu/cjeu/2004/c-237-04/para_27@2026-11-10

27In the first place, it is appropriate to establish whether Sotacarbo constitutes an undertaking for the purpose of that provision.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-237/04 · ECLI:EU:C:2006:197
Decided: 23 Mar 2006
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Tribunale di Cagliari (Italy)
Applicant: Enirisorse SpA
Defendant: Sotacarbo SpA
Rapporteur: R. Schintgen
Advocate General: M. Poiares Maduro
Bench: 5 judges
C.W.A. Timmermans, R. Schintgen, R. Silva de Lapuerta, P. Kūris, G. Arestis
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62004CJ0237

Topics

History · 1 version

23 Mar 2006Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 15: Criminal proceedings against X (C-390/18); Congregación de Escuelas Pías Provincia Betania v Ayuntamiento de Getafe (C-74/16)2 provisions; Pohotovosť s. r. o. v Miroslav Vašuta (C-470/12)2 provisions; Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-489/21); Kingdom of Denmark v European Commission (T-364/20); AlzChem AG v European Commission (T-284/15); Aziende riunite filovie ed autolinee Srl (ARFEA) v European Commission (T-720/16); Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-314/15); Orange v European Commission (C-211/15 P)8 provisions; French Republic and IFP Énergies nouvelles v European Commission (T-479/11); Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-446/14); French Republic v European Commission (T-135/12); Orange, anciennement France Télécom v European Commission (T-385/12); French Republic v European Commission (T-1/12)2 provisions; Hellenic Republic v European Commission (T-52/12)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Firma Ambulanz Glöckner v Landkreis Südwestpfalz (C-475/99); Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze v Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA, Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di San Miniato and Cassa di Risparmio di San Miniato SpA (C-222/04); Criminal proceedings against Claude Laguillaumie (C-116/00); Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (C-142/87); Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) and others v La Poste and others (C-39/94); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-118/85); Adria-Wien Pipeline GmbH and Wietersdorfer & Peggauer Zementwerke GmbH v Finanzlandesdirektion für Kärnten (C-143/99); French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-482/99); Klaus Höfner and Fritz Elser v Macrotron GmbH (C-41/90); Impresa Lombardini SpA - Impresa Generale di Costruzioni v ANAS - Ente nazionale per le strade and Società Italiana per Condotte d'Acqua SpA and Impresa Ing. Mantovani SpA v ANAS - Ente nazionale per le strade and Ditta Paolo Bregoli (C-285/99, C-286/99); Industrie Aeronautiche e Meccaniche Rinaldo Piaggio SpA v International Factors Italia SpA (Ifitalia), Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH and Ministero della Difesa (C-295/97); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-278/92, C-279/92, C-280/92); Fédération Nationale du Commerce Extérieur des Produits Alimentaires and Syndicat National des Négociants et Transformateurs de Saumon v French Republic (C-354/90); Pavel Pavlov and Others v Stichting Pensioenfonds Medische Specialisten (C-180/98, C-181/98, C-182/98, C-183/98, C-184/98); Ruth Hünermund and others v Landesapothekerkammer Baden-Württemberg (C-292/92); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-35/96); Altair Chimica SpA v ENEL Distribuzione SpA (C-207/01); Altmark Trans GmbH and Regierungspräsidium Magdeburg v Nahverkehrsgesellschaft Altmark GmbH, and Oberbundesanwalt beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht (C-280/00); Wolfgang Heiser v Finanzamt Innsbruck (C-172/03)