Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Ewald Burtscher v Josef Stauderer (C-213/04)
Judgment
Admissibility
Findings of the Court
32

Ewald Burtscher v Josef Stauderer (C-213/04)

Judgment of 1 Dec 2005law://eu/cjeu/2004/c-213-04/para_32@2026-11-12

32The Court must abide by the decision of a court of a Member State requesting a preliminary ruling in so far as that decision has not been overturned in any appeal procedures provided for by national law (Reina, paragraph 7; Balocchi, paragraph 17; and SFEI and Others, paragraph 24).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Third Chamber
Case: C-213/04 · ECLI:EU:C:2005:731
Decided: 1 Dec 2005
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria)
Applicant: Ewald Burtscher
Defendant: Josef Stauderer
Rapporteur: J.-P. Puissochet
Advocate General: F.G. Jacobs
Bench: 5 judges
A. Rosas, J. Malenovský, J.-P. Puissochet, S. von Bahr, U. Lõhmus
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62004CJ0213

Topics

Free movement of capital

History · 1 version

1 Dec 2005Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)
Cited by 7: 'SEGRO' Kft. v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal Sárvári Járási Földhivatala and Günther Horváth v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal (C-52/16, C-113/16); Request for a preliminary ruling from the Zalaegerszegi Járásbíróság (C-136/20); Genentech Inc. v Hoechst GmbH and Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH (C-567/14)2 provisions; Orizzonte Salute - Studio Infermieristico Associato v Azienda Pubblica di Servizi alla persona San Valentino – Città di Levico Terme and Others (C-61/14)2 provisions; TVI — Televisão Independente SA v Fazenda Pública (C-618/11, C-637/11, C-659/11)2 provisions; Promociones y Construcciones BJ 200 SL (C-125/12)2 provisions; Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato v Ente tabacchi italiani - ETI SpA and Others and Philip Morris Products SA and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato and Others (C-280/06)2 provisions
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Landesgrundverkehrsreferent der Tiroler Landesregierung v Beck Liegenschaftsverwaltungsgesellschaft mbH and Bergdorf Wohnbau GmbH, in liquidation (C-355/97); Doris Salzmann (C-300/01); Margarethe Ospelt and Schlössle Weissenberg Familienstiftung (C-452/01); Klaus Konle v Republik Österreich (C-302/97); Francesco Reina and Letizia Reina v Landeskreditbank Baden-Württemberg (65/81); Syndicat français de l'Express international (SFEI) and others v La Poste and others (C-39/94); Maurizio Balocchi v Ministero delle Finanze dello Stato (C-10/92); Criminal proceedings against Lucas Asjes and others, Andrew Gray and others, Andrew Gray and others, Jacques Maillot and others and Léo Ludwig and others (209/84, 210/84, 211/84, 212/84, 213/84); Criminal proceedings against Lucas Emilio Sanz de Lera, Raimundo Díaz Jiménez and Figen Kapanoglu (C-163/94, C-165/94, C-250/94); Hans Reisch and Others (joined cases C-515/99 and C-527/99 to C-540/99) v Bürgermeister der Landeshauptstadt Salzburg and Grundverkehrsbeauftragter des Landes Salzburg and Anton Lassacher and Others (joined cases C-519/99 to C-524/99 and C-526/99) v Grundverkehrsbeauftragter des Landes Salzburg and Grundverkehrslandeskommission des Landes Salzburg (C-515/99, C-519/99, C-520/99, C-521/99, C-522/99, C-523/99, C-524/99, C-526/99, C-527/99, C-528/99, C-529/99, C-530/99, C-531/99, C-532/99, C-533/99, C-534/99, C-535/99, C-536/99, C-537/99, C-538/99, C-539/99, C-540/99); Ditta Angelo Celestini v Saar-Sektkellerei Faber GmbH & Co. KG (C-105/94); Canal Satélite Digital SL v Adminstración General del Estado, and Distribuidora de Televisión Digital SA (DTS) (C-390/99)