Judgment_paragraph 38 · Werner Mangold v Rüdiger Helm (C-144/04)

38However, in the case in the main proceedings, it hardly seems arguable that the interpretation of Community law sought by the national court does actually respond to an objective need inherent in the outcome of a case pending before it. In fact, it is common ground that the contract has actually been performed and that its application raises a question of interpretation of Community law. The fact that the parties to the dispute in the main proceedings are at one in their interpretation of Paragraph 14(3) of the TzBfG cannot affect the reality of that dispute.

Werner Mangold v Rüdiger Helm (C-144/04)

Key facts

History · 1 version

Connections