Judgment_paragraph 36 · Solo Italia Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-373/03)

36Lastly, an applicant has no legitimate interest in the annulment of a decision on the ground of a procedural defect, where annulment of the decision can only lead to the adoption of another decision identical in substance to the decision annulled (see, to that effect, Case 117/81 Geist v Commission [1983] ECR 2191, paragraph 7; Case T-43/90 Díaz Garcia v Parliament [1992] ECR II-2619, paragraph 54; Case T-261/97 Orthmann v Commission [2000] ECR-SC I-A-181 and II-829, paragraphs 33 and 35; and Case T-16/02 Audi v OHIM (TDI) [2003] ECR II-5167).

Solo Italia Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-373/03)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version