Judgment_paragraph 21 · Consorzio per la tutela del formaggio Grana Padano v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-291/03)

21At the hearing OHIM stated that, in view of the judgments in Case T-107/02 GE Betz v OHIM — Atofina Chemicals (BIOMATE) [2004] ECR II-1845; Case T-379/03 Peek & Cloppenburg v OHIM (Cloppenburg) [2005] ECR II-4633; and judgment of 12 July 2006 in Case T-97/05 Rossi v OHIM — Marcorossi (MARCOROSSI), not published in the ECR, it was not required to defend systematically all the contested decisions of the Boards of Appeal It therefore concurred with the form of order sought by the applicant and requested the annulment of the contested decision.

Consorzio per la tutela del formaggio Grana Padano v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-291/03)

Key facts

Connections

History · 1 version