Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Commission of the European Communities (T-2/03)
Judgment
Law
The first plea, alleging failure to ca…
Findings of the Court
—Application of an exception related t…
108

Verein für Konsumenteninformation v Commission of the European Communities (T-2/03)

Judgment of 13 Apr 2005law://eu/cjeu/2003/t-2-03/para_108@2026-11-10

108Fifthly, it is not, in principle, appropriate that account should be taken of the amount of work entailed by the exercise of the applicant's right of access and its interest in order to vary the scope of that right.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · First Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-2/03 · ECLI:EU:T:2005:125
Decided: 13 Apr 2005
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Verein für Konsumenteninformation
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Vesterdorf
Bench: 5 judges
B. Vesterdorf, M. Jaeger, P. Mengozzi, M.E. Martins Ribeiro, I. Labucka
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62003TJ0002

Topics

Access to documents Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

13 Apr 2005Reading

Connections

Cited by 24: Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission (T-185/24); Huhtamaki Holding Sàrl v European Commission (T-225/24); ABLV Bank AS v European Central Bank (T-100/23)2 provisions; eClear AG v European Commission (T-127/23); Giorgio Basaglia v European Commission (T-597/21); Päivi Leino-Sandberg v European Parliament (T-421/17); Giorgio Basaglia v European Commission (T-727/19); Laurence Bonnafous v European Commission (T-646/18); Marco Montanari v European External Action Service (T-692/18); Intercept Pharma Ltd and Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v European Medicines Agency (T-377/18); Deutsche Lufthansa AG v European Commission (T-492/15); Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV v European Commission (T-498/14); Falcon Technologies International LLC v European Commission (T-875/16); Maria Psara and Others v European Parliament (T-639/15, T-94/16); Amicus Therapeutics UK Ltd and Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. v European Medicines Agency (T-33/17); Rogesa Roheisengesellschaft Saar mbH v European Commission (T-643/13); ClientEarth v European Commission (T-644/16); Emilio De Capitani v European Parliament (T-540/15); Pagkyprios organismos ageladotrofon (POA) Dimosia Ltd v European Commission (T-74/16); Access Info Europe v European Commission (T-851/16); Access Info Europe v European Commission (T-852/16); PTC Therapeutics International Ltd v European Medicines Agency (T-718/15); Pari Pharma GmbH v European Medicines Agency (T-235/15); MSD Animal Health Innovation GmbH and Intervet international BV v European Medicines Agency (T-729/15)
Cites 21: Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; Marguerite Johnston v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary (222/84); WWF UK (World Wide Fund for Nature) v Commission of the European Communities (T-105/95); Denkavit Nederland BV v Commission of the European Communities (T-20/99); Chemie Linz GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-245/92 P); Aldo Kuijer v Council of the European Union (T-188/98); Royal Philips Electronics NV v Commission of the European Communities (T-119/02); French Republic v Monsanto Company and Commission of the European Communities (C-248/99 P); Associazione Italiana Tecnico Economica del Cemento and British Cement Association and Blue Circle Industries plc and Castle Cement Ltd and The Rugby Goup plc and Titan Cement Company SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-447/93, T-448/93, T-449/93); Interporc Im- und Export GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-124/96); La Cinq SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-44/90); British American Tobacco International (Investments) Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-111/00); Tideland Signal Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-211/02); Siderúrgica Aristrain Madrid SL v Commission of the European Communities (C-196/99 P); The Queen v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Commissioners of Customs & Excise, ex parte National Farmers' Union, David Burnett and Sons Ltd, R. S. and E. Wright Ltd, Anglo Beef Processors Ltd, United Kingdom Genetics, Wyjac Calves Ltd, International Traders Ferry Ltd, MFP International Ltd, Interstate Truck Rental Ltd and Vian Exports Ltd (C-157/96); Heidi Hautala v Council of the European Union (T-14/98); JT's Corporation Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-123/99); Metropole télévision SA and Reti Televisive Italiane SpA and Gestevisión Telecinco SA and Antena 3 de Televisión v Commission of the European Communities (T-528/93, T-542/93, T-543/93, T-546/93); Aldo Kuijer v Council of the European Union (T-211/00); 2001/937/EC,ECSC,Euratom: Commission Decision of 5 December 2001 amending its rules of procedure (notified under document number C(2001) 3714); British Steel plc v Commission of the European Communities (T-243/94)