Judgment_paragraph 20 · L'Oréal SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-112/03)

20Secondly, the applicant argues that, by upholding the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting the request for proof of genuine use, the Board of Appeal infringed the principle of functional continuity, as laid down by the judgments of the Court of First Instance in Case T-163/98 Procter & Gamble v OHIM (BABYDRY) [1999] ECR II-2383, Case T-122/99 Procter & Gamble v OHIM (Soap bar shape) [2000] ECR II-265, Case T-198/00 Hershey Foods v OHIM (Kiss Device with plume) [2002] ECR II-2567, Case T-63/01 Procter & Gamble v OHIM (Soap bar shape) [2002] ECR II-5255 and Case T-308/01 Henkel v OHIM - LHS (UK) (KLEENCARE) [2003] ECR II-3255.