Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Jose Maria Sison v Council of the European Union (T-110/03, T-150/03, T-405/03)
Judgment
Law
4. The action in Case T-110/03
The third plea in law, alleging breach…
Findings of the Court
52

Jose Maria Sison v Council of the European Union (T-110/03, T-150/03, T-405/03)

Judgment of 26 Apr 2005law://eu/cjeu/2003/t-110-03/para_52@2026-11-12

52Consequently, the particular interest which may be asserted by a requesting party in obtaining access to a document concerning him personally cannot be taken into account when applying the mandatory exceptions provided for by Article 4(1) (a) of Regulation No 1049/2001.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber
Cases: T-110/03, T-150/03, T-405/03 · ECLI:EU:T:2005:143
Decided: 26 Apr 2005
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Jose Maria Sison
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: Forwood
Bench: 3 judges
J. Pirrung, N.J. Forwood, S. Papasavvas
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62003TJ0110

Topics

Access to documents Common foreign and security policy

History · 1 version

26 Apr 2005Reading

Connections

Cited by 20: OT v Council of the European Union (T-1095/23); MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, initially Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank (T-790/22); Giorgio Basaglia v European Commission (T-597/21); Organización de Consumidores y Usuarios (OCU) v European Central Bank (T-15/18); Aeris Invest Sàrl v European Central Bank (T-827/17); Espírito Santo Financial Group SA v European Central Bank (T-730/16); Espírito Santo Financial (Portugal), SGPS, SA v European Central Bank (T-251/15); Verein Deutsche Sprache eV v European Commission (T-468/16); Philip Morris Ltd v European Commission (T-800/14); Philip Morris Ltd v European Commission (T-796/14); International Management Group v European Commission (T-110/15)2 provisions; ClientEarth v European Commission (T-424/14, T-425/14)2 provisions; Rainer Typke v European Commission (T-214/13)2 provisions; Colin Boyd McCullough v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (T-496/13); Sea Handling SpA v European Commission (T-456/13); Darius Nicolai Spirlea and Mihaela Spirlea v European Commission (T-306/12)2 provisions; Reagens SpA v European Commission (T-181/10); Jürgen Beninca v European Commission (T-561/12); Kingdom of the Netherlands v European Commission (T-380/08)2 provisions; Leonard Besselink v Council of the European Union (T-331/11)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; Interporc Im- und Export GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-41/00 P); Jose Maria Sison v Council of the European Union (T-47/03); British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-311/00); Heidi Hautala v Council of the European Union (T-14/98); JT's Corporation Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-123/99); Aldo Kuijer v Council of the European Union (T-211/00); Kingdom of the Netherlands and Gerard van der Wal v Commission of the European Communities (C-174/98 P, C-189/98 P); 2003/480/EC: Council Decision of 27 June 2003 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2002/974/EC; 2002/460/EC: Council Decision of 17 June 2002 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2002/334/EC; 2002/848/EC: Council Decision of 28 October 2002 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2002/460/EC; 2002/974/EC: Council Decision of 12 December 2002 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2002/848/EC; Métropole Télévision (M6) v Commission of the European Communities (T-354/00); 94/90/ECSC, EC, Euratom: Commission Decision of 8 February 1994 on public access to Commission documents; 93/731/EC: Council Decision of 20 December 1993 on public access to Council documents; WWF UK (World Wide Fund for Nature) v Commission of the European Communities (T-105/95); Denkavit Nederland BV v Commission of the European Communities (T-20/99); Alsace International Car Service SARL (AICS) v European Parliament (T-365/00); Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism