Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Elizabeth Afari v European Central Bank (T-11/03)
Judgment
The claim for annulment
Plea of manifest error of assessment a…
Arguments of the parties
199

Elizabeth Afari v European Central Bank (T-11/03)

Judgment of 16 Mar 2004law://eu/cjeu/2003/t-11-03/para_199@2026-11-11

199The applicant recalls that, according to the case-law, the determination of the penalty to be imposed is based on a comprehensive appraisal of all the particular facts and the aggravating or mitigating circumstances peculiar to the case (Case T-26/89 De Compte v Parliament [1991] ECR II-781, paragraph 221).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court
Case: T-11/03 · ECLI:EU:T:2004:77
Decided: 16 Mar 2004
Procedure: staff cases unfounded
Applicant: Elizabeth Afari
Defendant: European Central Bank
Bench: 2 judges
H. Legal, M.E. Martins Ribeiro
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62003TJ0011

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

16 Mar 2004Reading

Connections

Cited by 25: KD v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-298/20); DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (T-470/20); Adrian Sorin Cristescu v European Commission (T-754/20); OT v European Parliament (T-757/20); NV v European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (T-661/20); DI v European Central Bank (T-514/19); International Forum for Sustainable Underwater Activities (IFSUA) v Council of the European Union (T-251/18); Laurence Bonnafous v Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (T-614/17); Chantal Hebberecht v European External Action Service (T-315/17); OY v European Commission (T-605/16); WQ v European Parliament (F-1/16); Bruno Dupré v European External Action Service (F-11/14); AX v European Central Bank (F-73/13); AX v European Central Bank (ECB) (F-7/11); Z v Court of Justice of the European Union (F-88/09); Gustav Eklund v European Commission (F-57/11); Gergely Toth v European Commission (F-107/05); Christophe Lesniak v European Commission (F-67/06); Salvatore Magazzu v European Commission (F-126/06); Christian Kurrer v European Commission (F-139/06); Stefano Sotgia v European Commission (F-130/06); Ragnar Bergström v European Commission (F-64/06); Fotios Nanopoulos v European Commission (F-30/08); N v European Parliament (F-26/09); Johanna Gerdina Pleijte v European Commission (F-91/08)
Cites 23: Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials); Bernard Connolly v European Commission (T-34/96); Council Directive 2000/43/EC of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin; F v European Commission (T-211/98); Jan Pflugradt v European Central Bank (T-178/00, T-341/00); Patrick Reynolds v European Parliament (T-237/00); Mario Campolargo v European Commission (T-372/00); Henri Maurissen v Court of Auditors of the European Union (417/85); Norman Pyres v Commission of the European Communities (T-7/01); Calvin Williams v Court of Auditors of the European Union (T-146/94); N v European Commission (T-273/94); Calvin Williams v Court of Auditors of the European Union (T-146/89); X v European Central Bank (T-333/99); Hubert Onidi v European Commission (T-197/00); V v European Commission (T-40/95); Rui Teixeira Neves v Court of Justice of the European Union (T-259/97); Cesare Alfieri v European Parliament (3/66); G v Commission of the European Communities (T-199/01); Agustin Quijano v European Commission (T-169/95); Michelle Huet v Court of Auditors of the European Union (T-8/93); Susan Ryan-Sheridan v European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (T-589/93); European Commission v V (C-188/96 P); Henri de Compte v European Parliament (T-26/89)