14As regards the position of a Turkish worker who, like Mr Dogan, enjoys in the host Member State, after four years of legal employment, ‘the right of free access to any paid employment of his choice’ in that Member State, in accordance with the third indent of Article 6(1), the Court has repeatedly held not only that the direct effect of that provision means that the person concerned derives an individual employment right directly from Decision No 1/80, but also that to be effective that right necessarily implies a concomitant right of residence which does not depend on the continuing existence of the conditions for access to those rights (see Case C-192/89 Sevince [1990] ECR I-3461, paragraphs 29 and 31; Case C-237/91 Kus [1992] ECR I-6781, paragraph 33; Tetik, paragraphs 26, 30 and 31; and Nazli, paragraphs 28 and 40; see also, by analogy, concerning the second indent of the first sentence of Article 7 of Decision No 1/80, Case C-329/97 Ergat [2000] ECR I-1487, paragraph 40, and Case C-467/02 Cetinkaya [2004] ECR I-10895, paragraph 31; and, concerning the second sentence of Article 7, Case C-355/93 Eroglu [1994] ECR I-5113, paragraph 20, and Case C-210/97 Akman [1998] ECR I-7519, paragraph 24).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.