Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-301/03)
Judgment
Admissibility of the action
22

Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-301/03)

Judgment of 1 Dec 2005law://eu/cjeu/2003/c-301-03/para_22@2026-11-10

22The reference to a proposal is a clear and specific indication that the content of the document is not intended to have legal effects.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-301/03 · ECLI:EU:C:2005:727
Decided: 1 Dec 2005
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Italian Republic
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: C.W.A. Timmermans
Advocate General: F.G. Jacobs
Bench: 5 judges
C.W.A. Timmermans, C. Gulmann, R. Schintgen, G. Arestis, J. Klucka
Language: Italian
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62003CJ0301

Topics

European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)

History · 1 version

1 Dec 2005Reading

Connections

Cited by 12: European Federation of Public Service Unions (EPSU) and Jan Willem Goudriaan v European Commission (T-310/18)2 provisions; Multiconnect GmbH v European Commission (T-884/16); Mass Response Service GmbH v European Commission (T-885/16); 1&1 Telecom GmbH v European Commission (T-43/16); Intrasoft International SA v European Commission (T-403/12)2 provisions; United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v European Central Bank (ECB) (T-496/11)2 provisions; Alro SA v European Commission (T-517/12)2 provisions; Alpiq RomIndustries Srl and Alpiq RomEnergie Srl v European Commission (T-129/13); Hungary v European Commission (C-31/13 P)2 provisions; Deutsche Post AG and Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (C-463/10 P)2 provisions; Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-258/06); Italian Republic v European Commission (T-185/05)
Cites 4: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); International Business Machines Corporation v Commission of the European Communities (C-60/81); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-443/97); Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 of 21 June 1999 laying down general provisions on the Structural Funds