Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Maatschap Toeters and M. C. Verberk v Productschap Vee en Vlees (C-171/03)
Judgment
The questions referred
Question 1(c)
43

Maatschap Toeters and M. C. Verberk v Productschap Vee en Vlees (C-171/03)

Judgment of 11 Nov 2004law://eu/cjeu/2003/c-171-03/para_43@2026-11-10

43As the Advocate General pointed out in paragraph 33 of his Opinion, Article 50a clearly means that an application can be regarded as having been ‘lodged’ only when its addressee receives it. It is not therefore sufficient that an application was posted within the time-limit.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-171/03 · ECLI:EU:C:2004:714
Decided: 11 Nov 2004
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven (Netherlands)
Upheld as valid: Regulation 1992/3886
Applicants: Maatschap Toeters; M.C. Verberk
Defendant: Productschap Vee en Vlees
Rapporteur: A. Rosas
Advocate General: M. Poiares Maduro
Bench: 2 judges
A. Rosas, R. Silva de Lapuerta
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62003CJ0171

Topics

Common organisation of the markets

History · 1 version

11 Nov 2004Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3886/92 of 23 December 1992 laying down detailed rules for the application of the premium schemes provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 on the common organization of the market in beef and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 1244/82 and (EEC) No 714/89; Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of the Council of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits
Cited by 4: EP Agrarhandel GmbH v Bundesminister für Land-, Forst-, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft (C-554/16)2 provisions; Peter Hehenberger v Republik Österreich (C-188/11)2 provisions; Vicente J. Jiménez Sarmiento v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-455/09); Maatschap Schonewille-Prins v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (C-45/05)2 provisions
Cites 9: The Queen v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Commissioners of Customs & Excise, ex parte National Farmers' Union, David Burnett and Sons Ltd, R. S. and E. Wright Ltd, Anglo Beef Processors Ltd, United Kingdom Genetics, Wyjac Calves Ltd, International Traders Ferry Ltd, MFP International Ltd, Interstate Truck Rental Ltd and Vian Exports Ltd (C-157/96); Rudolf Misset v Council of the European Union (C-152/85); Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 of the Council of 27 June 1968 on the common organisation of the market in beef and veal; Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of the Council of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits; Commission Regulation (EC) No 2311/96 of 2 December 1996 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3886/92 laying down detailed rules for the application of premium schemes in the beef and veal sector; Galileo Zaninotto v Ispettorato Centrale Repressione Frodi - Ufficio di Conegliano - Ministero delle risorse agricole, alimentari e forestali (C-375/96); Denkavit France SARL v Fonds d'orientation et de régularisation des marchés agricoles (FORMA) (C-266/84); Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3886/92 of 23 December 1992 laying down detailed rules for the application of the premium schemes provided for in Council Regulation (EEC) No 805/68 on the common organization of the market in beef and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 1244/82 and (EEC) No 714/89; Antonio Crispoltoni v Fattoria Autonoma Tabacchi and Giuseppe Natale and Antonio Pontillo v Donatab Srl (C-133/93, C-300/93, C-362/93)