Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Anna Herrero Romeu v European Commission (T-298/02)
Judgment
Legal context
Subject-matter of the proceedings
B —The allowances associated with the…
83

Anna Herrero Romeu v European Commission (T-298/02)

Judgment of 25 Oct 2005law://eu/cjeu/2002/t-298-02/para_83@2026-11-12

83The applicant claims that, if she is found eligible for the expatriation allowance the case-law must be applied according to which she is automatically entitled to the daily subsistence allowance and the installation allowance (Case C-62/97 P Commission v Lozano Palacios [1998] ECR I-3273).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · First Chamber
Case: T-298/02 · ECLI:EU:T:2005:369
Decided: 25 Oct 2005
Procedure: staff cases unfounded
Applicant: Anna Herrero Romeu
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: García-Valdecasas
Bench: 3 judges
J.D. Cooke, R. García-Valdecasas, V. Trstenjak
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62002TJ0298

Topics

Staff Regulations of Officials

History · 1 version

25 Oct 2005Reading

Connections

Cited by 10: GW v European Commission (T-662/24); QB v European Commission (T-71/21); Raffaele Dalmasso v European Commission (F-61/05); Anna Herrero Romeu v European Commission (C-8/06); Nikos Giannopoulos v Council of the European Union (F-111/06); B v European Commission (F-7/06); European Commission v Sonja Hosman-Chevalier (C-424/05 P); Elisabeth De Smedt v European Commission (F-59/05); Sabine Grünheid v European Commission (F-101/05); Herta Adam v European Commission (T-342/04)
Cites 25: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Ekro BV Vee- en Vleeshandel v Produktschap voor Vee en Vlees (327/82); Franz Lemaitre v European Commission (T-317/99); Nadia Costacurta Gelabert v European Commission (T-18/91); Komninos Diamantaras v European Commission (T-72/94); Claudia de Angelis v European Commission (246/83); Pedro Magdalena Fernández v European Commission (C-452/93 P); Benito Latino v European Commission (T-300/97); Hermann Wite v European Parliament (188/83); Evangelos Vardakas v European Commission (T-4/92); D v Council of the European Union (T-264/97); Michael Nevin v European Commission (T-127/00); D and Kingdom of Sweden v Council of the European Union (C-122/99 P, C-125/99 P); Diego Echauz Brigaldi and Others v European Commission (T-156/95); Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 of the Council of 29 February 1968 laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the Commission (Staff Regulations of Officials); René Hochstrass v Court of Justice of the European Union (147/79); Gustave Rose v European Commission (T-22/99); Elisabeth Benzler v European Commission (T-63/91); European Commission v María Lidia Lozano Palacios (C-62/97 P); Magdalena Fernández v European Commission (T-90/92); Gaetano Vutera v European Commission (1322/79); Paraskevi Liaskou v Council of the European Union (T-60/00); Albert Ruckdeschel & Co. and Hansa-Lagerhaus Ströh & Co. v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-St. Annen ; Diamalt AG v Hauptzollamt Itzehoe (C-117/76, C-16/77); Hedwig Kuchlenz-Winter v European Commission (T-66/95); Giuseppe La Pietra v European Commission (T-100/92)