346Finally, the applicant notes that the concept of deterrence includes a preventive aspect with respect to the offender (special prevention) and with respect to any other economic operators which might, in the future, commit similar infringements (general prevention). In this case, special prevention is already ensured by the applicant's adoption of the compliance programme. If the Commission were to consider that the increase is guided only by general preventive considerations, the applicant submits that it would conflict with the case-law of the Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance (Case 36/75Rutili [1975] ECR 1219, paragraphs 51 to 53; Case 30/77Bouchereau [1977] ECR 1999, paragraphs 27 to 30; and Case C-340/97Nazli and Others [2000] ECR I-957, paragraph 63).