Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d'Iran v Council of the European Union (T-228/02)
Judgment
The application for annulment of the c…
Findings of the Court
59

Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d'Iran v Council of the European Union (T-228/02)

Judgment of 12 Dec 2006law://eu/cjeu/2002/t-228-02/para_59@2026-11-11

59The Court, exercising the limited judicial review within its competence under the EC Treaty, can therefore only find that the contested Common Position does not infringe the Community's competences.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber
Case: T-228/02 · ECLI:EU:T:2006:384
Decided: 12 Dec 2006
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple ďIran
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: Forwood
Bench: 3 judges
J. Pirrung, N.J. Forwood, S. Papasavvas
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62002TJ0228

Topics

Common foreign and security policy Free movement of capital

History · 1 version

12 Dec 2006Reading

Connections

Cited by 25: Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union (T-297/23); Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union (T-298/23); Musa Yusopovich Bazhaev v Council of the European Union (T-362/22); Igor Albertovich Kesaev v Council of the European Union (T-290/22); Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich v Council of the European Union (T-313/22); Alexey Mordashov v Council of the European Union (T-248/22); Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko v Council of the European Union (T-252/22); Elena Petrovna Timchenko v Council of the European Union (T-361/22); Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union (T-92/22); Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union (T-91/22); Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union (T-95/22); Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union (T-96/22); Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union (T-90/22); Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union (T-98/22); Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union (T-110/21); Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union (T-104/21); Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union (T-107/21); Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union (T-105/21); Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union (T-103/21); Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda v Council of the European Union (T-106/21); John Numbi v Council of the European Union (T-112/21); Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union (T-120/21); Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary v Council of the European Union (T-119/21); Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union (T-109/21); Pilatus Bank plc and Pilatus Holding ltd. v European Central Bank (T-27/19)
Cites 12: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)9 provisions; Treaty on European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (Text with EEA relevance); Bernard Michel v European Parliament (195/80); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P); Atlanta AG and others v Commission of the European Communities and Council of the European Union (C-104/97 P); Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community; Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism; Paola Casini v European Commission (T-132/03); Federal Republic of Germany v Commission of the European Communities (C-301/96); Jean-Marie Le Pen v European Parliament (C-208/03 P)