Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Ter Lembeek International NV v Commission of the European Communities (T-217/02)
Judgment
Decision 2001/856 and the formal inves…
44

Ter Lembeek International NV v Commission of the European Communities (T-217/02)

Judgment of 23 Nov 2006law://eu/cjeu/2002/t-217-02/para_44@2026-11-11

44The Kingdom of Belgium brought an action for annulment of that decision before the Court of Justice, which dismissed the action by judgment of 3 July 2003 in Case C-457/00 Belgium v Commission [2003] ECR I-6931.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fifth Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-217/02 · ECLI:EU:T:2006:361
Decided: 23 Nov 2006
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Ter Lembeek International NV
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Martins Ribeiro
Bench: 5 judges
M. Vilaras, M.E. Martins Ribeiro, F. Dehousse, D. Šváby, K. Jürimäe
Language: Dutch
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62002TJ0217

Topics

History · 1 version

23 Nov 2006Reading

Connections

Cited by 14: Norddeutsche Landesbank – Girozentrale v Single Resolution Board (T-407/22); UniCredit Bank GmbH, anciennement UniCredit Bank AG v Single Resolution Board (T-405/22); AO Nevinnomysskiy Azot and AO Novomoskovskaya Aktsionernaya Kompania NAK "Azot" v European Commission (T-865/19); TV2/Danmark A/S v European Commission (T-674/11)2 provisions; Kingdom of the Netherlands and Nederlandse Omroep Stichting (NOS) v European Commission (T-231/06); Freistaat Sachsen and Land Sachsen-Anhalt v European Commission (T-396/08); Électricité de France (EDF) v European Commission (T-156/04); Holland Malt BV v Commission of the European Communities (T-369/06); Territorio Histórico de Álava - Diputación Foral de Álava and Comunidad autónoma del País Vasco - Gobierno Vasco and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-230/01); Territorio Histórico de Álava - Diputación Foral de Álava and Comunidad autónoma del País Vasco - Gobierno Vasco and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-227/01); Jan Rudolf Maas and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-81/07); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (T-424/05); Associazione italiana del risparmio gestito and Fineco Asset Management SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-445/05); TV 2/Danmark A/S and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-309/04)
Cites 21: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)4 provisions; Hubert Huygens v Commission of the European Communities (T-281/01); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-351/98); Het Vlaamse Gewest (Flemish Region) v Commission of the European Communities (T-214/95); Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty; French Government v Commission of the European Communities (C-15/76, C-16/76); Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (C-197/99 P); Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (C-75/97); Saxonia Edelmetalle GmbH and Zeitzer Maschinen, Anlagen Geräte (ZEMAG) GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-111/01, T-133/01); Klöckner-Werke AG and Hoesch AG v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community (C-17/61, C-20/61); Salomon SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-123/97); Philip Morris Holland BV v Commission of the European Communities (C-730/79); British Airways plc, Scandinavian Airlines System Denmark-Norway-Sweden, Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV, Air UK Ltd, Euralair international, TAT European Airlines SA and British Midland Airways Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-371/94, T-394/94); Kingdom of the Netherlands and Leeuwarder Papierwarenfabriek BV v Commission of the European Communities (296/82, 318/82); Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (C-457/00); Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale and Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v Commission of the European Communities (T-228/99, T-233/99); Kingdom of Belgium v Commission of the European Communities (234/84); Siemens SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-459/93); Fleuren Compost BV v Commission of the European Communities (T-109/01); Albert Ruckdeschel & Co. and Hansa-Lagerhaus Ströh & Co. v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-St. Annen ; Diamalt AG v Hauptzollamt Itzehoe (C-117/76, C-16/77)