Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Fred Olsen, SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-17/02)
Judgment
Admissibility
II —Assessment by the Court
75

Fred Olsen, SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-17/02)

Judgment of 15 Jun 2005law://eu/cjeu/2002/t-17-02/para_75@2026-11-11

75In the present case, the Kingdom of Spain is the sole addressee of the contested decision, which was notified to it by a letter from the Vice-President of the Commission dated 25 July 2001.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-17/02 · ECLI:EU:T:2005:218
Decided: 15 Jun 2005
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Fred Olsen, SA
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Meij
Bench: 5 judges
J. Pirrung, A.W.H. Meij, N.J. Forwood, I. Pelikánová, S.S. Papasawas
Language: Spanish
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62002TJ0017

Topics

History · 1 version

15 Jun 2005Reading

Connections

Cited by 20: Oltchim SA v European Commission (T-565/19)2 provisions; Volotea, SA v European Commission (T-607/17); Multiconnect GmbH v European Commission (T-884/16); Mass Response Service GmbH v European Commission (T-885/16); French Republic v European Commission (T-366/13); Société nationale maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM) v European Commission (T-454/13); Abertis Telecom Terrestre, SA and Telecom Castilla-La Mancha, SA v European Commission (T-37/15); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-808/14); Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (T-461/13)2 provisions; Comunidad Autónoma de Cataluña and Centre de Telecomunicacions i Tecnologies de la Informació de la Generalitat de Catalunya (CTTI) v European Commission (T-465/13); Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco and Itelazpi, SA v European Commission (T-462/13)2 provisions; Abertis Telecom, SA and Retevisión I, SA v European Commission (T-541/13); Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia and Redes de Telecomunicación Galegas Retegal, SA (Retegal) v European Commission (T-463/13); Navarra de Servicios y Tecnologías, SA v European Commission (T-487/13); Direct Way and Directway Worldwide v European Parliament (T-126/13)2 provisions; Castelnou Energía, SL v European Commission (T-57/11)2 provisions; Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission (T-295/12); Zweckverband Tierkörperbeseitigung in Rheinland-Pfalz, im Saarland, im Rheingau-Taunus-Kreis und im Landkreis Limburg-Weilburg v European Commission (T-309/12); Iliad and Others v European Commission (T-325/10); Coordination bruxelloise d’institutions sociales et de santé (CBI) v European Commission (T-137/10)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Council Regulation (EEC) No 3577/92 of 7 December 1992 applying the principle of freedom to provide sevices to maritime transport within Member States (maritime cabotage); Finnish Board Mills Association - Finnboard v Commission of the European Communities (T-338/94); Regione Siciliana v Commission of the European Communities (T-190/00); Thermenhotel Stoiser Franz Gesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-158/99); Bretagne Angleterre Irlande (BAI) v Commission of the European Communities (T-14/96); Federal Republic of Germany v Council of the European Union (C-122/95); Asociación Profesional de Empresas Navieras de Líneas Regulares (Analir) and Others v Administración General del Estado (C-205/99); Kingdom of Spain v Commission of the European Communities (C-351/98); Municipality of Almelo and others v NV Energiebedrijf Ijsselmij (C-393/92); EPAC - Empresa para a Agroalimentação e Cereais, SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-204/97, T-270/97); Dillinger Hüttenwerke AG v Commission of the European Communities (236/86); Commission of the European Communities v Council of the European Union (C-309/95); Klöckner-Werke AG v Commission of the European Communities (119/81); Finsider v Commission of the European Communities (250/83); Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty; Europemballage Corporation and Continental Can Company Inc. v Commission of the European Communities (6/72); Klöckner-Werke AG and Hoesch AG v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community (C-17/61, C-20/61); French Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-17/99); Fédération française des sociétés d'assurances (FFSA), Union des sociétés étrangères d'assurances (USEA), Groupe des assurances mutuelles agricoles (Groupama), Fédération nationale des syndicats d'agents généraux d'assurances (FNSAGA), Fédération française des courtiers d'assurances et de réassurances (FCA) and Bureau international des producteurs d'assurances et de réassurances (BIPAR) v Commission of the European Communities (T-106/95)