Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
BASF AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-15/02)
Judgment
The claims for annulment and for reduc…
E —Sixth plea: infringement of Section…
2. Findings of the Court
(a)Whether the applicant satisfied the…
Whether decisive evidence within the m…
500

BASF AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-15/02)

Judgment of 15 Mar 2006law://eu/cjeu/2002/t-15-02/para_500@2026-11-11

500It is true that there is no such general obligation on the defendant institution (see, to that effect, Case T-221/95 Endemol v Commission [1999] ECR II-1299, paragraph 94, and Atlantic Container Line and Others v Commission, paragraph 47 above, paragraph 351).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Fourth Chamber
Case: T-15/02 · ECLI:EU:T:2006:74
Decided: 15 Mar 2006
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: BASF AG
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Mengozzi
Bench: 3 judges
H. Legal, P. Mengozzi, I. Wiszniewska-Białecka
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62002TJ0015

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

15 Mar 2006Reading

Connections

Cited by 21: Crédit agricole SA and Crédit agricole Corporate and Investment Bank v European Commission (T-113/17); SJ AB v European Commission (T-659/20); Qualcomm, Inc. v European Commission (T-235/18); Eleveté Invest Group, SL and Others v European Commission and Single Resolution Board (T-523/17); Algebris (UK) Ltd and Anchorage Capital Group LLC v European Commission (T-570/17); Wieland-Werke AG v European Commission (T-251/19); Campine NV and Campine Recycling NV v European Commission (T-240/17); NeXovation, Inc. v European Commission (T-353/15); Servier SAS and Others v European Commission (T-691/14); H. Lundbeck A/S and Lundbeck Ltd v European Commission (T-472/13)2 provisions; EGL, Inc. and Others v European Commission (T-251/12); Toshiba Corp. v European Commission (T-404/12)2 provisions; Deutsche Börse AG v European Commission (T-175/12); Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission (T-70/10); Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission (T-90/10); Alfa Acciai SpA v European Commission (T-85/10); Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Valsabbia Investimenti SpA v European Commission (T-92/10); Leali SpA and Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi SpA v European Commission (T-489/09); Sasol and Others v European Commission (T-541/08)2 provisions; (publication by extracts) Intel Corp. v European Commission (T-286/09)2 provisions; Donau Chemie AG v European Commission (T-406/09)
Cites 23: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); A. Ahlström Osakeyhtiö and others v Commission of the European Communities (89/85, 104/85, 114/85, 116/85, 117/85, 125/85, 126/85, 127/85, 128/85, 129/85); Atlantic Container Line AB and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-191/98, T-212/98, T-213/98, T-214/98); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P); NV Nederlandsche Banden Industrie Michelin v Commission of the European Communities (322/81); Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. AG v Commission of the European Communities (85/76); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80); Volkswagen AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-338/00 P); Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-185/95 P); Archer Daniels Midland Company and Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-224/00); ACF Chemiefarma NV v Commission of the European Communities (41/69); Cascades SA v Commission of the European Communities (C-279/98 P); Mo Och Domsjö AB v Commission of the European Communities (T-352/94); Dunlop Slazenger International Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-43/92); Hercules Chemicals NV v Commission of the European Communities (C-51/92 P); Commission of the European Communities v Anic Partecipazioni SpA (C-49/92 P); JFE Engineering Corp., formerly NKK Corp., Nippon Steel Corp., JFE Steel Corp. and Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-67/00, T-68/00, T-71/00, T-78/00); EEC Council: Regulation No 17: First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty; Audi AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-16/02); Dansk Rørindustri A/S, Isoplus Fernwärmetechnik Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH and Others, KE KELIT Kunststoffwerk GmbH, LR af 1998 A/S, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, LR af 1998 (Deutschland) GmbH and ABB Asea Brown Boveri Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P, C-206/02 P, C-207/02 P, C-208/02 P, C-213/02 P); Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV, Elf Atochem SA, BASF AG, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd, DSM NV, DSM Kunststoffen BV, Wacker-Chemie GmbH, Hoechst AG, Société artésienne de vinyle, Montedison SpA, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Hüls AG and Enichem SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-305/94, T-306/94, T-307/94, T-313/94, T-314/94, T-315/94, T-316/94, T-318/94, T-325/94, T-328/94, T-329/94, T-335/94)