Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Établissements Biret et Cie SA v Council of the European Union (C-94/02 P)
Judgment
The appeal
Second plea
73

Établissements Biret et Cie SA v Council of the European Union (C-94/02 P)

Judgment of 30 Sept 2003law://eu/cjeu/2002/c-94-02/para_73@2026-11-10

73The second plea must therefore be rejected as unfounded.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Full Court
Case: C-94/02 P · ECLI:EU:C:2003:518
Decided: 30 Sept 2003
Procedure: Appeal
Applicant: Etablissements Biret et Cie SA
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Rapporteur: M. Wathelet
Advocate General: S. Alber
Bench: 12 judges
J.-P. Puissochet, M. Wathelet, R. Schintgen, C.W.A. Timmermans (Presidents of Chambers), C. Gulmann, D.A.O. Edward, P. Jann, V. Skouris, F. Macken, N. Colneric, S. von Bahr, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62002CJ0094

Topics

Veterinary legislation

History · 1 version

30 Sept 2003Reading

Connections

Cited by 8: Acron PAO and Others v European Commission (T-45/19); European Commission v Rusal Armenal ZAO (C-21/14 P)2 provisions; European Commission v IPK International - World Tourism Marketing Consultants GmbH (C-336/13 P); Carlo De Nicola v European Investment Bank (EIB) (T-618/11); Carlo De Nicola v European Investment Bank (EIB) (T-264/11); Schneider Electric SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-351/03)2 provisions; Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Chiquita Banana Co. BV and Chiquita Italia, SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-19/01)2 provisions; KWS Saat AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (C-447/02 P)
Cites 18: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; 94/800/EC: Council Decision (of 22 December 1994) concerning the conclusion on behalf of the European Community, as regards matters within its competence, of the agreements reached in the Uruguay Round multilateral negotiations (1986-1994); Council Directive 81/602/EEC of 31 July 1981 concerning the prohibition of certain substances having a hormonal action and of any substances having a thyrostatic action; Council Directive 88/299/EEC of 17 May 1988 on trade in animals treated with certain substances having a hormonal action and their meat, as referred to in Article 7 of Directive 88/146/EEC; Commission of the European Communities v Chambre syndicale nationale des entreprises de transport de fonds et valeurs (Sytraval) and Brink's France SARL (C-367/95 P); Atlanta AG and others v Commission of the European Communities and Council of the European Union (C-104/97 P); Nakajima All Precision Co. Ltd v Council of the European Communities (C-69/89); Petrotub SA and Republica SA v Council of the European Union (C-76/00 P); Portuguese Republic v Council of the European Union (C-149/96); Fédération de l'industrie de l'huilerie de la CEE (Fediol) v Commission of the European Communities (C-70/87); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Communities (C-68/86); Etablissements Biret et Cie SA v Council of the European Union (T-210/00); OGT Fruchthandelsgesellschaft mbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-St. Annen (C-307/99); The Queen v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, ex parte Omega Air Ltd and Omega Air Ltd , Aero Engines Ireland Ltd and Omega Aviation Services Ltd v Irish Aviation Authority (C-27/00, C-122/00); Council Directive 96/22/EC of 29 April 1996 concerning the prohibition on the use in stockfarming of certain substances having a hormonal or thyrostatic action and of ß-agonists, and repealing Directives 81/602/EEC, 88/146/EEC and 88/299/EEC; Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine animals and swine and fresh meat from third countries; Council Directive 85/649/EEC of 31 December 1985 prohibiting the use in livestock farming of certain substances having a hormonal action; Council Directive 88/146/EEC of 7 March 1988 prohibiting the use in livestock farming of certain substances having a hormonal action