27Furthermore, the Court of First Instance rejected the arguments of Chemi-Con that the situation in the present case was comparable to that which led to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2553/93 of 13 September 1993 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2089/84 imposing a definitive antidumping duty on imports of certain ball bearings originating in Japan and Singapore (OJ 1993 L 235, p. 3), which fixed the retroactive effect of the expiry of a definitive antidumping duty, imposed prior to that regulation, at the date of the initiation of the review procedure. It pointed out that the circumstances leading to that regulation were, in many respects, different from those which lay behind the contested regulation (paragraph 59) of the judgment under appeal.
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.