Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Hilde Schönheit v Stadt Frankfurt am Main and Silvia Becker v Land Hessen (C-4/02, C-5/02)
Judgment
The third to ninth questions (C-4/02 a…
Findings of the Court
90

Hilde Schönheit v Stadt Frankfurt am Main and Silvia Becker v Land Hessen (C-4/02, C-5/02)

Judgment of 23 Oct 2003law://eu/cjeu/2002/c-4-02/para_90@2026-11-10

90In that regard, it should be stated at the outset that, as the Advocate General has noted at point 102 of his Opinion, Community law does not preclude a retirement pension being calculated pro rata temporis in the case of part-time employment.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice
Cases: C-4/02, C-5/02 · ECLI:EU:C:2003:583
Decided: 23 Oct 2003
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicants: Hilde Schönheit; Silvia Becker
Defendants: Stadt Frankfurt am Main (C-4/02); Land Hessen (C-5/02)
Rapporteur: La Pergola
Advocate General: L.A. Geelhoed
Bench: 2 judges
P. Jann, S. von Bahr
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62002CJ0004

Topics

Social policy Social security

History · 1 version

23 Oct 2003Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 17: Ottica New Line di Accardi Vincenzo v Comune di Campobello di Mazara (C-539/11)2 provisions; Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Tiziana Bruno and Massimo Pettini and Daniela Lotti and Clara Matteucci (C-395/08, C-396/08)2 provisions; Impact v Minister for Agriculture and Food and Others (C-268/06); EB and Others v Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB) (C-405/20); PG v Ministero della Giustizia and Others (C-236/20)2 provisions; YS v NK (C-223/19); Violeta Villar Láiz v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS) and Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) (C-161/18); Ute Kleinsteuber v Mars GmbH (C-354/16); Joachim Pöpperl v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (C-187/15); Österreichischer Gewerkschaftsbund v Verband Österreichischer Banken und Bankiers (C-476/12)2 provisions; Johann Odar v Baxter Deutschland GmbH (C-152/11)2 provisions; Dermod Patrick O’Brien v Ministry of Justice, formerly Department for Constitutional Affairs (C-393/10)2 provisions; Zentralbetriebsrat der Landeskrankenhäuser Tirols v Land Tirol (C-486/08)2 provisions; Nicolas Bressol and Others and Céline Chaverot and Others v Gouvernement de la Communauté française (C-73/08)2 provisions; Evangelina Gómez-Limón Sánchez-Camacho v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS), Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) and Alcampo SA (C-537/07); Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic (C-46/07); Tadao Maruko v Versorgungsanstalt der deutschen Bühnen (C-267/06)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Helga Kutz-Bauer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (C-187/00); Stadt Lengerich v Angelika Helmig and Waltraud Schmidt v Deutsche Angestellten-Krankenkasse and Elke Herzog v Arbeiter-Samariter-Bund Landverband Hamburg eV and Dagmar Lange v Bundesknappschaft Bochum and Angelika Kussfeld v Firma Detlef Bogdol GmbH and Ursula Ludewig v Kreis Segeberg (C-399/92); Regina v Secretary of State for Employment, ex parte Nicole Seymour-Smith and Laura Perez (C-167/97); Douglas Harvey Barber v Guardian Royal Exchange Assurance Group (C-262/88); Gerardus Cornelis Ten Oever v Stichting Bedrijfspensioenfonds voor het Glazenwassers- en Schoonmaakbedrijf (C-109/91); Joseph Griesmar v Ministre de l'Economie, des Finances et de l'Industrie and Ministre de la Fonction publique, de la Réforme de l'Etat et de la Décentralisation (C-366/99); Birgitte Jørgensen v Foreningen af Speciallæger and Sygesikringens Forhandlingsudvalg (C-226/98); Bestuur van het Algemeen Burgerlijk Pensioenfonds v G. A. Beune (C-7/93); Council Directive 97/80/EC of 15 December 1997 on the burden of proof in cases of discrimination based on sex; Pirkko Niemi (C-351/00); Ingrid Rinner-Kühn v FWW Spezial-Gebäudereinigung GmbH & Co. KG (C-171/88); M. A. De Weerd, née Roks, and others v Bestuur van de Bedrijfsvereniging voor de Gezondheid, Geestelijke en Maatschappelijke Belangen and others (C-343/92); Council Directive 86/378/EEC of 24 July 1986 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in occupational social security schemes; Anna Adriaantje Vroege v NCIV Instituut voor Volkshuisvesting BV and Stichting Pensioenfonds NCIV (C-57/93); Council Directive 96/97/EC of 20 December 1996 amending Directive 86/378/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in occupational social security schemes; Dimossia Epicheirissi Ilektrismou (DEI) v Efthimios Evrenopoulos (C-147/95); Mary Teresa Magorrian and Irene Patricia Cunningham v Eastern Health and Social Services Board and Department of Health and Social Services (C-246/96); Edith Freers and Hannelore Speckmann v Deutsche Bundespost (C-278/93); Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security