Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Roberto Adanez-Vega v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (C-372/02)
Judgment
Questions referred
Fourth question: principle of equality…
57

Roberto Adanez-Vega v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (C-372/02)

Judgment of 11 Nov 2004law://eu/cjeu/2002/c-372-02/para_57@2026-11-10

57For the reasons stated by the Advocate General at paragraphs 94 and 97 of his Opinion, Article 3 of Regulation No 1408/71 is not applicable in the main proceedings because the regulation contains special provisions, namely Article 67 which governs an unemployed person's entitlement to unemployment benefit.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · First Chamber
Case: C-372/02 · ECLI:EU:C:2004:705
Decided: 11 Nov 2004
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Bundessozialgericht (Germany)
Applicant: Roberto Adanez-Vega
Defendant: Bundesanstalt für Arbeit
Rapporteur: P. Jann
Advocate General: F.G. Jacobs
Bench: 3 judges
P. Jann, A. Rosas, S. von Bahr
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62002CJ0372

Topics

Social security

History · 1 version

11 Nov 2004Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community
Cited by 7: Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank and Y v X and Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank (C-713/20); Office national de l'emploi (ONEm) v M and M v Office national de l’emploi (ONEm) and Caisse auxiliaire de paiement des allocations de chômage (CAPAC) (C-284/15)2 provisions; C.E. Franzen and Others v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank (C-382/13); Theodora Hendrika Bouman v Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen (C-114/13); F.P. Jeltes and Others v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (C-443/11)2 provisions; J. A. van Delft and Others v College voor zorgverzekeringen (C-345/09)2 provisions; A (C-523/07)
Cites 15: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community; María Martínez Sala v Freistaat Bayern (C-85/96); Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of the Council of 21 March 1972 fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community; Anne Kuusijärvi v Riksförsäkringsverket (C-275/96); Doris Knoch v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (C-102/91); Silvana di Paolo v Office national de l'emploi (C-76/76); Fitzwilliam Executive Search Ltd v Bestuur van het Landelijk instituut sociale verzekeringen (C-202/97); A. A. Ten Holder v Bestuur van de Nieuwe Algemene Bedrijfsvereniging (C-302/84); M. E. S. Luijten v Raad van Arbeid (C-60/85); Gordon Sinclair Gray v Adjudication Officer (C-62/91); Roberto Adanez-Vega v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (C-372/02); Josef Rebmann v Bundesversicherungsanstalt für Angestellte (C-58/87); Regulation (EEC) No 1048/71 of the Council of 25 May 1971 amending Regulation (EEC) No 766/68 laying down general rules for granting export refunds on sugar as regards adjustments to the refund; Barry Banks and Others v Theatre royal de la Monnaie (C-178/97)