Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Nicole Wippel v Peek & Cloppenburg GmbH & Co. KG (C-313/02)
Judgment
The questions referred
First question
39

Nicole Wippel v Peek & Cloppenburg GmbH & Co. KG (C-313/02)

Judgment of 12 Oct 2004law://eu/cjeu/2002/c-313-02/para_39@2026-11-10

39As the United Kingdom Government rightly pointed out, it is for the referring court to make such determinations as may be necessary in order to verify whether that is the situation in the case before it.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Grand Chamber
Case: C-313/02 · ECLI:EU:C:2004:607
Decided: 12 Oct 2004
Procedure: Preliminary reference · referred by the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria)
Applicant: Nicole Wippel
Defendant: Peek & Cloppenburg GmbH & Co. KG
Rapporteur: F. Macken
Advocate General: J. Kokott
Bench: 10 judges
P. Jann, C.W.A. Timmermans, A. Rosas, R. Silva de Lapuerta, K. Lenaerts, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen, F. Macken, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, K. Schiemann
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62002CJ0313

Topics

History · 1 version

12 Oct 2004Reading

Connections

Interprets 2: Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC - Annex : Framework agreement on part-time work; Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions
Cited by 8: Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) v Tiziana Bruno and Massimo Pettini and Daniela Lotti and Clara Matteucci (C-395/08, C-396/08)2 provisions; Impact v Minister for Agriculture and Food and Others (C-268/06); Ville de Mons and Zone de secours Hainaut - Centre v RM (C-377/21)2 provisions; Sindicatul Familia Constanţa and Others v Direcţia Generală de Asistenţă Socială şi Protecţia Copilului Constanţa (C-147/17); Johann Odar v Baxter Deutschland GmbH (C-152/11)2 provisions; Dermod Patrick O’Brien v Ministry of Justice, formerly Department for Constitutional Affairs (C-393/10)2 provisions; Abdelkader Dellas and Others v Premier ministre and Ministre des Affaires sociales, du Travail et de la Solidarité (C-14/04)2 provisions; Vasiliki Nikoloudi v Organismos Tilepikoinonion Ellados AE (C-196/02)2 provisions
Cites 15: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions; Sindicato de Médicos de Asistencia Pública (Simap) v Conselleria de Sanidad y Consumo de la Generalidad Valenciana (C-303/98); Landeshauptstadt Kiel v Norbert Jaeger (C-151/02); Susanna Brunnhofer v Bank der österreichischen Postsparkasse AG (C-381/99); Katharina Rinke v Ärztekammer Hamburg (C-25/02); Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions; A. G. Lawrence and Others v Regent Office Care Ltd, Commercial Catering Group and Mitie Secure Services Ltd (C-320/00); Birgitte Jørgensen v Foreningen af Speciallæger and Sygesikringens Forhandlingsudvalg (C-226/98); D and Kingdom of Sweden v Council of the European Union (C-122/99 P, C-125/99 P); The Queen v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry, ex parte Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematographic and Theatre Union (BECTU) (C-173/99); Council Directive 75/117/EEC of 10 February 1975 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the application of the principle of equal pay for men and women; Erika Steinicke v Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (C-77/02); Bärbel Kachelmann v Bankhaus Hermann Lampe KG (C-322/98); Council Directive 97/81/EC of 15 December 1997 concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC - Annex : Framework agreement on part-time work; Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organization of working time