Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v European Commission (T-66/01)
Judgment
Facts
22

Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd v European Commission (T-66/01)

Judgment of 25 Jun 2010law://eu/cjeu/2001/t-66-01/para_22@2026-11-10

22On the same date, the Commission also adopted Decision 2003/5/EC relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (COMP/33.133-B: Soda ash — Solvay, CFK) (OJ 2003 L 10, p. 1) and Decision 2003/6/EC relating to a proceeding under Article 82 [EC] (COMP/33.133-C: Soda ash — Solvay) (OJ 2003 L 10, p. 10).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Sixth Chamber
Case: T-66/01 · ECLI:EU:T:2010:255
Decided: 25 Jun 2010
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd,
Defendant: European Commission
Rapporteur: V. Vadapalas
Bench: 3 judges
A.W.H. Meij, V. Vadapalas, A. Dittrich
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62001TJ0066

Topics

Dominant position

History · 1 version

25 Jun 2010Reading

Connections

Cited by 22: Alexander Dmitrievich Pumpyanskiy v Council of the European Union (T-369/24); Qualcomm, Inc. v European Commission (T-671/19); Nizar Assaad v Council of the European Union (T-426/21); BZ v European Central Bank (T-500/16); Think Schuhwerk GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-298/19); DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (T-632/19); Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament (T-95/18); John Dalli v European Commission (T-399/17); PAO Rosneft Oil Company, formerly NK Rosneft OAO and Others v Council of the European Union (T-715/14); Haw Par Corp. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-25/16); Mohammed Al-Ghabra v European Commission (T-248/13); Riva Fire SpA v European Commission (T-83/10); Lucchini SpA v European Commission (T-91/10)2 provisions; Leali SpA and Acciaierie e Ferriere Leali Luigi SpA v European Commission (T-489/09); Industrie Riunite Odolesi SpA (IRO) v European Commission (T-69/10); Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Valsabbia Investimenti SpA v European Commission (T-92/10); Alfa Acciai SpA v European Commission (T-85/10); Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission (T-90/10); SP SpA v European Commission (T-472/09, T-55/10)2 provisions; Feralpi Holding SpA v European Commission (T-70/10); (publication by extracts) Intel Corp. v European Commission (T-286/09)2 provisions; Donau Chemie AG v European Commission (T-406/09)
Cites 20: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)6 provisions; Nederlandse Federatieve Vereniging voor de Groothandel op Elektrotechnisch Gebied v Commission of the European Communities (C-105/04 P); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); Dalmine SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-407/04 P); Commission of the European Communities v French Republic (C-1/00); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV, Elf Atochem SA, BASF AG, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd, DSM NV, DSM Kunststoffen BV, Wacker-Chemie GmbH, Hoechst AG, Société artésienne de vinyle, Montedison SpA, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Hüls AG and Enichem SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-305/94, T-306/94, T-307/94, T-313/94, T-314/94, T-315/94, T-316/94, T-318/94, T-325/94, T-328/94, T-329/94, T-335/94); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-417/06); Atlantic Container Line AB and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-191/98, T-212/98, T-213/98, T-214/98); Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd and Nippon Steel Corp. v Commission of the European Communities (C-403/04 P, C-405/04 P); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P); United Brands Company and United Brands Continentaal BV v Commission of the European Communities (27/76); NV Nederlandsche Banden Industrie Michelin v Commission of the European Communities (322/81); Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. AG v Commission of the European Communities (85/76); Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany (C-191/95); Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities (C-281/89); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80); Baustahlgewebe GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (C-185/95 P); Rosmarie Kapferer v Schlank & Schick GmbH (C-234/04); Erika Lenz and Volker Lenz v Commission of the European Communities (C-277/95); The Queen v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Secretary of State for Health, ex parte: Fedesa and others (C-331/88)