Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

Every law, versioned and linked. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Kabushiki Kaisha Fernandes v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-39/01)

Kabushiki Kaisha Fernandes v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (T-39/01)

Text not heldlaw://eu/cjeu/2001/t-39-01@2026-11-10

Version in force on

GlobalLawDB does not hold this law's text yet

It is listed because other laws cite it or it appears in the official index. Its details are below.

Key facts

Connections

Cited by 24: Implementing Technologies, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-545/24); Implementing Technologies, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-544/24); Land Oberösterreich v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-46/25); Siemens Healthineers AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1175/23); Rústicas del Guadalquivir SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-301/24); Noster Finance SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-263/24); K-Way SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-372/24); Nio Holding Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-598/23); Nio Holding Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-593/23); RTL Group Markenverwaltungs GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1088/23); RTL Group Markenverwaltungs GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1089/23); Lorenz Switzerland AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-469/24); Xilin Gol League Xiyang Mutton Industry Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-140/24); e-dialog GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-1075/23); Tes Electrical Electronic Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-517/23); Hecht Pharma GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-520/23); Lucien Haddad v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-538/23); Dr. Neumann & Kindler GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-674/22); Dr. Neumann & Kindler GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-673/22); Consultora de Telecomunicaciones Optiva Media SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-601/22); adp Merkur GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-350/22); Innovaciones Cosmético Farmacéuticas SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-27/22); CEDC International sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-145/22)2 provisions; Stone Brewing Co. LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-200/20)