167As a second step, it is necessary to examine the effects of that error in the present case. The impact must therefore be assessed in the light of the present head of claim, which relates to the injury allegedly caused to the applicant as a result of the fact that the imports from CAS Corp. were taken into account together with those which had been dumped (see, to that effect, Joined Cases T-163/94 and T-165/94 NTN Corporation and Koyo Seiko v Council [1995] ECR II-1381, paragraphs 112 to 115). For the judgment to be annulled it is not sufficient that the Council committed an error. That error must also have had an impact on the determination of whether there is injury and thus on the content of the regulation itself.
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.