135The Council contends, first, that the bedlinen report on which the applicant relies is not directly applicable in the Community legal system. Moreover, it asserts that the applicant has misinterpreted the report, which is in perfect keeping with the method used by the Community institutions to determine injury. According to the Council, the present complaint concerns inadequacy of the statement of reasons for the purposes of Article 253 EC. Relying on the judgment in Joined Cases T-33/98 and T-34/98 Petrotub and Republica v Council [1999] ECR II-3837, which was annulled on appeal by the judgment in Case C-76/00 P Petrotub and Republica v Council [2003] ECR I-79, it argues that the institutions have an obligation to analyse, in the regulation imposing definitive antidumping measures, only the factors which have been found to be relevant.
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.