Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Roquette Frères SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-322/01)
Judgment
Law
III —Attenuating circumstances
A —Arguments of the parties
204

Roquette Frères SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-322/01)

Judgment of 27 Sept 2006law://eu/cjeu/2001/t-322-01/para_204@2026-11-12

204In Roquettes view, those omissions constitute a breach of the Guidelines and contravene the principles established by the case-law (Case T-2/89 Petrofina v Commission [1991] ECR II-1087, paragraph 173, and Case T-308/94 Cascades v Commission [1998] ECR II-925, paragraphs 230 and 231).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Third Chamber
Case: T-322/01 · ECLI:EU:T:2006:267
Decided: 27 Sept 2006
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Roquette Frères
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Azizi
Bench: 3 judges
J. Azizi, M. Jaeger, F. Dehousse
Language: French
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62001TJ0322

Topics

Agreements, decisions and concerted practices

History · 1 version

27 Sept 2006Reading

Connections

Cited by 21: Alisher Usmanov v Council of the European Union (T-1117/23); BT Global Services Belgium v European Commission (T-1081/23); UBS Group AG, venant aux droits de Credit Suisse Group AG and Others v European Commission (T-84/22); CQ v European Court of Auditors (T-386/19); Kingdom of Denmark v European Commission (T-364/20); IR v European Commission (T-685/21); Nichicon Corporation v European Commission (T-342/18); Laurence Bonnafous v Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (T-614/17); OY v European Commission (T-605/16); The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. v European Commission (T-419/14); Marine Harvest ASA v European Commission (T-704/14); TestBioTech eV and Others v European Commission (T-177/13); National Iranian Tanker Company v Council of the European Union (T-207/15); Italian Republic v European Commission (T-384/14); Hamid Reza Emadi v Council of the European Union (T-274/13); Mohammad Sarafraz v Council of the European Union (T-273/13); Italian Republic v European Commission (T-358/13)2 provisions; Corporación Empresarial de Materiales de Construcción, SA, formerly Uralita, SA v European Commission (T-250/12)2 provisions; Verein zur Wahrung von Einsatz und Nutzung von Chromtrioxid und anderen Chrom-VI-verbindungen in der Oberflächentechnik eV (VECCO) and Others v European Commission (T-360/13)2 provisions; Fapricela - Indústria de Trefilaria, SA v European Commission (T-398/10)2 provisions; European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Others v European Commission (T-536/11)
Cites 25: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016); Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); Pfizer Animal Health SA v Council of the European Union (T-13/99); British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-311/00); Hoechst AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-227/92 P); Archer Daniels Midland Company and Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-224/00); Asia Motor France SA, Jean-Michel Cesbron, Monin automobiles SA and Europe auto services (EAS) SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-154/98); Établissements Consten S.à.R.L. and Grundig-Verkaufs-GmbH v Commission of the European Economic Community (C-56/64, C-58/64); Hüls AG v Commission of the European Communities (C-199/92 P); Henk Altmann and Margaret Casson v Commission of the European Communities (T-177/94, T-377/94); Commission of the European Communities v Anic Partecipazioni SpA (C-49/92 P); EEC Council: Regulation No 17: First Regulation implementing Articles 85 and 86 of the Treaty; Gencor Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (T-102/96); HFB Holding für Fernwärmetechnik Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-9/99); Het Vlaamse Gewest (Flemish Region) v Commission of the European Communities (T-214/95); Groupement des Cartes Bancaires "CB" and Europay International SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-39/92, T-40/92); Alpharma Inc. v Council of the European Union (T-70/99); LR AF 1998 A/S, formerly Løgstør Rør A/S v Commission of the European Communities (T-23/99); Cipeke - Comércio e Indústria de Papel Ldª v Commission of the European Communities (T-84/96); Deutsche Bahn AG v Commission of the European Communities (T-229/94); Vereniging van Samenwerkende Prijsregelende Organisaties in de Bouwnijverheid and others v Commission of the European Communities (C-137/95); Atlantic Container Line AB and Others v Commission of the European Communities (T-191/98, T-212/98, T-213/98, T-214/98); French Government v Commission of the European Communities (C-15/76, C-16/76); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P); SA Musique Diffusion française and others v Commission of the European Communities (100/80, 101/80, 102/80, 103/80)