Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Honeywell International, Inc. v Commission of the European Communities (T-209/01)
Judgment
Law
1.The scope of the action and the subj…
Findings of the Court
The reference to the pleas raised in C…
63

Honeywell International, Inc. v Commission of the European Communities (T-209/01)

Judgment of 14 Dec 2005law://eu/cjeu/2001/t-209-01/para_63@2026-11-10

63In the present case, as observed above, the applicant's reference in its application relates to the application lodged on the same day by another applicant, GE.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: General Court · Second Chamber, sitting with five Judges
Case: T-209/01 · ECLI:EU:T:2005:455
Decided: 14 Dec 2005
Procedure: Action for annulment
Applicant: Honeywell International Inc.
Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
Rapporteur: Forwood
Bench: 5 judges
J. Pirrung, V. Tiili, A.W.H. Meij, M. Vilaras, N.J. Forwood
Language: English
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62001TJ0209

Topics

Dominant position

History · 1 version

14 Dec 2005Reading

Connections

Cited by 24: Novis Insurance Company, Novis Versicherungsgesellschaft, Novis Compagnia di Assicurazioni, Novis Poisťovňa a.s. v European Commission (T-185/24); LAT Nitrogen Piesteritz GmbH, formerly Borealis Agrolinz Melamine Deutschland GmbH and Cornerstone Chemical Co. v European Chemicals Agency (T-167/23); Trasta Komercbanka AS v European Central Bank (ECB) (C-90/23); Isabel Nehera and Others v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-334/23); Alisher Usmanov v Council of the European Union (T-237/22); Stadtwerke Leipzig GmbH v European Commission (T-55/21); GGEW, Gruppen-Gas- und Elektrizitätswerk Bergstraße AG v European Commission (T-62/21); EVH GmbH v European Commission (T-53/21); Stadtwerke Hameln Weserbergland GmbH, formerly GWS Stadtwerke Hameln GmbH v European Commission (T-58/21); TEAG Thüringer Energie AG v European Commission (T-56/21); eins energie in sachsen GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission (T-59/21); EnergieVerbund Dresden GmbH v European Commission (T-61/21); Naturstrom AG v European Commission (T-60/21); Cyprian Iwuć v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-492/22); Trasta Komercbanka AS and Others v European Central Bank (T-698/16); Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy v European Commission (T-603/19); ASL Aviation Holdings DAC and ASL Airlines (Ireland) Ltd v European Commission (T-540/18)2 provisions; Jörg Lück v European Union Intellectual Property Office (T-188/21); French Republic v European Chemicals Agency (T-127/20); Nader Kalai v Council of the European Union (T-178/19); Ireland and Aughinish Alumina Ltd v European Commission (T-129/07); Italian Republic and Eurallumina SpA v European Commission (T-119/07); BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (T-888/16); Instytut Podstawowych Problemów Techniki Polskiej Akademii Nauk (IPPT PAN) v European Commission and Research Executive Agency (REA) (T-805/16)
Cites 25: Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV (LVM), DSM NV and DSM Kunststoffen BV, Montedison SpA, Elf Atochem SA, Degussa AG, Enichem SpA, Wacker-Chemie GmbH and Hoechst AG and Imperial Chemical Industries plc (ICI) v Commission of the European Communities (C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P, C-251/99 P, C-252/99 P, C-254/99 P); Société Fives Lille Cail and others v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community (C-19/60, C-21/60, C-2/61, C-3/61); Schneider Electric SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-310/01); Graphischer Maschinenbau GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-126/99); Commission of the European Communities and French Republic v Télévision française 1 SA (TF1) (C-302/99 P, C-308/99 P); Commission of the European Communities v AssiDomän Kraft Products AB, Iggesunds Bruk AB, Korsnäs AB, MoDo Paper AB, Södra Cell AB, Stora Kopparbergs Bergslags AB and Svenska Cellulosa AB (C-310/97 P); Moccia Irme SpA, Ferriera Lamifer SpA and Ferriera Acciaieria Casilina SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-280/99 P, C-281/99 P, C-282/99 P); Bo Forvass v European Commission (T-203/97); Asia Motor France SA, Jean-Michel Cesbron, Monin automobiles SA and Europe auto services (EAS) SA v Commission of the European Communities (T-154/98); Colin Joynson v Commission of the European Communities (T-231/99); Mo Och Domsjö AB v Commission of the European Communities (T-352/94); Alfons Lütticke GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (4/69); Danske Busvognmænd v Commission of the European Communities (T-157/01); Imperial Chemical Industries plc v Commission of the European Communities (T-37/91); ADT Projekt Gesellschaft der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Tierzüchter mbH v Commission of the European Communities (T-145/98); Cipeke - Comércio e Indústria de Papel Ldª v Commission of the European Communities (T-84/96); RJB Mining plc v Commission of the European Communities (T-110/98); Mehibas Dordtselaan BV v Commission of the European Communities (T-290/97); Alfredo Grifoni v Commission of the European Communities (C-330/88); Lemmerz-Werke GmbH v High Authority of the ECSC (111/63); Conseil national des professions de l'automobile, Fédération nationale des distributeurs, loueurs et réparateurs de matériels de bâtiment-travaux publics et de manutention, Auto Contrôle 31 SA, Yam 31 SARL, Roux SA, Marc Foucher-Creteau and Verdier distribution SARL v Commission of the European Communities (C-341/00); Council Regulation (EC) No 1310/97 of 30 June 1997 amending Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 on the control of concentrations between undertakings; Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between undertakings; Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij NV, Elf Atochem SA, BASF AG, Shell International Chemical Company Ltd, DSM NV, DSM Kunststoffen BV, Wacker-Chemie GmbH, Hoechst AG, Société artésienne de vinyle, Montedison SpA, Imperial Chemical Industries plc, Hüls AG and Enichem SpA v Commission of the European Communities (T-305/94, T-306/94, T-307/94, T-313/94, T-314/94, T-315/94, T-316/94, T-318/94, T-325/94, T-328/94, T-329/94, T-335/94); Aalborg Portland A/S, Irish Cement Ltd, Ciments français SA, Italcementi - Fabbriche Riunite Cemento SpA, Buzzi Unicem SpA and Cementir - Cementerie del Tirreno SpA v Commission of the European Communities (C-204/00 P, C-205/00 P, C-211/00 P, C-213/00 P, C-217/00 P, C-219/00 P)