55The applicant submits that its application satisfies the requirements of Article 44(1) (c) of the Rules of Procedure. In that regard, it argues that it duly indicated the damage suffered and that the application mentions the various aspects of the damage and the basic criteria on which to base its quantification. According to the case-law, those facts are sufficient to satisfy the requirements of Article 44(1 )(c) of the Rules of Procedure (Case T-277/97 Ismeri Europa v Court of Auditors [1999] ECR II-1825, paragraph 67). Finally, the applicant argues that the criticisms made by the Commission fall within the determination of the substance of the action and must, accordingly, be examined in that context (Case T-554/93 Saint and Murray v Council and Commission [1997] ECR II-563, paragraph 59; Case T-38/96 Guerin Automobiles v Commission [1997] ECR II-1223, paragraph 42; and Case T-184/95 Dorsch Consult v Council and Commission [1998] ECR II-667, paragraph 23).
Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.