Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Hamann International GmbH Spedition + Logistik v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (C-337/01)
Judgment
The question
29

Hamann International GmbH Spedition + Logistik v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt (C-337/01)

Judgment of 12 Feb 2004law://eu/cjeu/2001/c-337-01/para_29@2026-11-10

29It is clear from the wording of Article 204 of the Customs Code that it applies only to situations which do not fall within the scope of Article 203 of the same code.

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice · Second Chamber
Case: C-337/01 · ECLI:EU:C:2004:90
Decided: 12 Feb 2004
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Applicant: Hamann International GmbH Spedition + Logistik
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Stadt
Rapporteur: R. Schintgen
Advocate General: A. Tizzano
Bench: 2 judges
R. Schintgen, N. Colneric
Language: German
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62001CJ0337

Topics

Customs Union and Common Customs Tariff

History · 1 version

12 Feb 2004Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code
Cited by 10: Rottendorf Pharma GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld (C-92/20); Wallenborn Transports SA v Hauptzollamt Gießen (C-571/15)2 provisions; „Latvijas Dzelzceļš” VAS v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests (C-154/16); B & S Global Transit Center BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-319/14)3 provisions; SEK Zollagentur GmbH v Hauptzollamt Gießen (C-75/13)2 provisions; Minister van Financiën v X BV (C-480/12)2 provisions; Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects and Chef de l’agence de poursuites de la Direction nationale du renseignement et des enquêtes douanières v Harry Winston SARL (C-273/12)2 provisions; Terex Equipment Ltd, FG Wilson (Engineering) Ltd and Caterpillar EPG Ltd v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs (C-430/08); Militzer & Münch GmbH v Ministero delle Finanze (C-230/06); British American Tobacco Manufacturing BV v Hauptzollamt Krefeld (C-222/01)2 provisions
Cites 5: Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code; Liberexim BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën (C-371/99); Commission Regulation (EC) No 993/2001 of 4 May 2001 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (Text with EEA relevance).; D. Wandel GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bremen (C-66/99); Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code