Skip to content

GlobalLawDBby GenieAI

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Search the text of the law

Log in Get an API key

Laws Search Sanctions Map Data Developers

Log in Get an API key

The Global Law Database. Free to read, built for people and AI agents.

Explore

All laws
Search the text
Sanctions
Map of connections
Compare UK and EU

Developers

AI agents (MCP)
REST API
Bulk data
API keys

Coverage

United Kingdom
European Union
United States
Canada
Australia
France
Germany
Netherlands
Spain
Austria
Norway
Finland
Switzerland
Ireland

GlobalLawDB is made by GenieAI, London. It is not legal advice: check the official text before relying on it. Text comes from official publishers under their licences, listed on the Data page.

ThemeMatch my systemLightDark

European Union
Doris Salzmann (C-300/01)
Judgment
The third question
66

Doris Salzmann (C-300/01)

Judgment of 15 May 2003law://eu/cjeu/2001/c-300-01/para_66@2026-11-10

66However, that jurisdiction to interpret the EEA Agreement under Article 234 EC applies solely with regard to the Communities. The Court therefore has no jurisdiction to rule on the interpretation of that agreement as regards its application in the EFTA States (Andersson and Wåkerås-Andersson, paragraph 28).

Source: EUR-Lex, © European Union, 1998-2026. Reuse authorised under Decision 2011/833/EU.

Key facts

Court: Court of Justice
Case: C-300/01 · ECLI:EU:C:2003:283
Decided: 15 May 2003
Procedure: Preliminary reference
Rapporteur: Puissochet
Advocate General: P. Léger
Bench: 4 judges
R. Schintgen, V. Skouris, F. Macken, J.N. Cunha Rodrigues
Official: CURIA · EUR-Lex 62001CJ0300

Topics

Free movement of capital New accessions

History · 1 version

15 May 2003Reading

Connections

Interprets 1: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)2 provisions
Cited by 17: Miasto Łowicz v Skarb Państwa – Wojewoda Łódzki and Prokurator Generalny v VX and Others (C-558/18, C-563/18); CARTESIO Oktató és Szolgáltató bt (C-210/06); Federico Cipolla v Rosaria Fazari, née Portolese and Stefano Macrino and Claudia Capoparte v Roberto Meloni (C-94/04, C-202/04)2 provisions; Criminal proceedings against Ministère public (C-371/24); Duygu Eliz Erkut v Fondazione Teatro alla Scala di Milano (C-668/24); République de Moldavie v Komstroy LLC (C-741/19)2 provisions; D. Z. v Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL (C-584/18); Génesis Seguros Generales Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros (Génesis) v Boys Toys SA and Administración del Estado (C-190/10)2 provisions; Établissements Rimbaud SA v Directeur général des impôts and Directeur des services fiscaux d’Aix-en-Provence (C-72/09)2 provisions; Roda Golf & Beach Resort SL (C-14/08); Erich Stamm and Anneliese Hauser (C-13/08); Trespa International BV v Nova Haven- en Vervoerbedrijf NV (C-248/07); Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato v Ente tabacchi italiani - ETI SpA and Others and Philip Morris Products SA and Others v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato and Others (C-280/06)2 provisions; Amurta SGPS v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Amsterdam (C-379/05)2 provisions; Max Rampion and Marie-Jeanne Godard, née Rampion v Franfinance SA and K par K SAS (C-429/05)2 provisions; J. van der Weerd and Others, H. de Rooy sr. and H. de Rooy jr., Maatschap H. en J. van ’t Oever and Others and B. J. van Middendorp v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit (C-222/05, C-223/05, C-224/05, C-225/05)2 provisions; Finanzamt Offenbach am Main-Land v Keller Holding GmbH (C-471/04)
Cites 13: Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated 2016)3 provisions; Landesgrundverkehrsreferent der Tiroler Landesregierung v Beck Liegenschaftsverwaltungsgesellschaft mbH and Bergdorf Wohnbau GmbH, in liquidation (C-355/97); Union royale belge des sociétés de football association ASBL v Jean-Marc Bosman, Royal club liégeois SA v Jean-Marc Bosman and others and Union des associations européennes de football (UEFA) v Jean-Marc Bosman (C-415/93); Klaus Konle v Republik Österreich (C-302/97); Council Directive 88/361/EEC of 24 June 1988 for the implementation of Article 67 of the Treaty; Ulla-Brith Andersson and Susannne Wåkerås-Andersson v Svenska staten (Swedish State) (C-321/97); Criminal proceedings against Lucas Emilio Sanz de Lera, Raimundo Díaz Jiménez and Figen Kapanoglu (C-163/94, C-165/94, C-250/94); Hans Reisch and Others (joined cases C-515/99 and C-527/99 to C-540/99) v Bürgermeister der Landeshauptstadt Salzburg and Grundverkehrsbeauftragter des Landes Salzburg and Anton Lassacher and Others (joined cases C-519/99 to C-524/99 and C-526/99) v Grundverkehrsbeauftragter des Landes Salzburg and Grundverkehrslandeskommission des Landes Salzburg (C-515/99, C-519/99, C-520/99, C-521/99, C-522/99, C-523/99, C-524/99, C-526/99, C-527/99, C-528/99, C-529/99, C-530/99, C-531/99, C-532/99, C-533/99, C-534/99, C-535/99, C-536/99, C-537/99, C-538/99, C-539/99, C-540/99); Roman Angonese v Cassa di Risparmio di Bolzano SpA (C-281/98); Andersen og Jensen ApS v Skatteministeriet (C-43/00); Schutzverband gegen unlauteren Wettbewerb v TK-Heimdienst Sass GmbH (C-254/98); Canal Satélite Digital SL v Adminstración General del Estado, and Distribuidora de Televisión Digital SA (DTS) (C-390/99); Criminal proceedings against Jean-Pierre Guimont (C-448/98)